The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Telerehabilitation — a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation
Abstract
Community resources for stroke clients are underdeveloped in Hong Kong and stroke survivors often face difficulties in community reintegration. We have examined the feasibility of using videoconferencing for community-based stroke rehabilitation. The sample comprised 21 stroke patients living at home. All the subjects participated in an eight-week intervention programme at a community centre for seniors. The intervention, which comprised educational talks, exercise and psychosocial support, was conducted by a physiotherapist via a videoconference link. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS), State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) and a stroke knowledge test were administered at the start and end of the programme. In addition, at the start of the study the Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item Short Form, the Elderly Mobility Scale and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale were used to assess subjects' baseline status, and a focus group was also held at the end of the programme to gather qualitative findings. Nineteen subjects completed the eight-week intervention. The baseline functional status was high, although 52% had symptoms of depression. After the intervention, there were significant improvements in BBS, SSES and knowledge test scores and scores on all subscales of the SF-36. All the subjects accepted the use of videoconferencing for delivery of the intervention. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility, efficacy and high level of acceptance of telerehabilitation for community-dwelling stroke clients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke
Takahashi, C. D., Der-Yeghiaian, L., Le, V., Motiwala, R. R., & Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm311 · Cited by 624
Kairy, D., Lehoux, P., Vincent, C., & Visintin, M. (2009) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280802062553 · Cited by 587
Introduction to the Practice of Telemedicine
Craig, J., & Petterson, V. (2005) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x0501100102 · Cited by 503
Schwamm, L. H., Holloway, R. G., Amarenco, P., Audebert, H. J., Bakas, T., Chumbler, N. R., Handschu, R., Jauch, E. C., Knight, W. A., Levine, S. R., et al. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.192360 · Cited by 449
Telerehabilitation in stroke care – a systematic review
Johansson, T., & Wild, C. (2011) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2010.100105 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, J. C., Woo, J., Hui, E., & Chan, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 199-205
- ISSN
- 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1109
- OpenAlex
- W1998907195
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Telerehabilitation — a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1258/1357633041424340
- The paper
- Lai, J. C., Woo, J., Hui, E., & Chan, W. (2004). Telerehabilitation — a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633041424340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.