Cited by 17Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records SystemsICT in Developing Communities

Implementation and evaluation of a low-cost telemedicine station in the remote Ecuadorian rainforest

Cone, Stephen W, Hummel, Russell, León, Juan, Merrell, Ronald C·2007·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

A clinical workstation was developed to provide basic telemedicine services in a medical clinic in rural Ecuador. The unit cost was less than $1000. The system provided videoconferencing and a Spanish language electronic medical record (EMR) for clinic consultations. All partners participated in the development of the EMR. Over a six-month period, almost all new patient encounters and ultrasound studies were entered into the EMR. Of 2387 patient encounters, 572 were recorded in electronic format and 80% were transmitted over the Internet for consultation. Four hundred and eight ultrasound studies were filed with the EMR and 90% were transmitted over the Internet for shared evaluation. During the six months of the study, there were no serious software or hardware problems. The doctor in Ecuador was initially trained at the laboratory in the USA. The two sites were in contact by email almost daily. Without such interaction, the performance of the software and hardware would probably have been worse. When a structured programme of instruction, protocols, EMR and technology support is in place, telemedicine can support remote rural practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/135763307779701220

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies on the topic of tele-ultrasound in resource-limited settings were not included because they did not report a patient care intervention or meaningful clinical outcomes.

    “Several studies on the topic of tele-ultrasound in resource-limited settings were not included because they did not report a patient care intervention or meaningful clinical outcomes (20, 57–60).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cone, S. W., Hummel, R., León, J., & Merrell, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Clinica Luxemburgo, Macas, Ecuador
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
31-34
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2053545139
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
Keywords
telemedicine, rural health care, videoconferencing, electronic health records, telehealth implementation, telemedicine evaluation
MeSH terms
Computer Systems, Ecuador, Humans, Information Systems, Medically Underserved Area, Ultrasonography, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Telemedicine, Rural Health Services, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review