Cited by 54Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Systems and Technology

A randomized controlled trial of telemedicine in an emergency department

Brennan, John A, Kealy, John A, Gerardi, Lisa H, Shih, Richard, Allegra, John, Sannipoli, Laurene, Lutz, Don·1998·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

A prospective study of emergency department telemedicine was carried out at two hospitals in northern New Jersey. One hundred and twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and four (85%) consented to participate, with 54 being randomized to the telemedicine group and 50 to the control group. Four patients did not complete the protocol. No significant differences were seen between the groups for: occurrence of 72 h emergency department return visits (0% vs 0%); need for additional care (2.3% vs 2.4%); positive patient-physician interaction (98% vs 100%); positive patient-nurse interaction (98% vs 98%); positive overall patient satisfaction (98% vs 95%). The average patient throughput time (time from admission to discharge) for the telemedicine group was 106 min; the average for the control group was 117 min. Telemedicine was found to be a satisfactory technique for pre-selected emergency department patients and was viewed by the physicians as an acceptable method of complementary care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/1357633981931911

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar findings on patient satisfaction in telemedicine have been reported in other RCTs.

    “Similar findings have also been reported in other RCTs of patient satisfaction in telemedicine.”

    From Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial (2006) · cites this paper as [39]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brennan, J. A., Kealy, J. A., Gerardi, L. H., Shih, R., Allegra, J., Sannipoli, L., & Lutz, D.
Affiliations
  • Northwest Covenant Medical Center, Denville, New Jersey
  • Med America, Livingston, New Jersey
  • Morristown Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
1998-03
Volume
4
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
18-20
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2055011562
Cited by
54
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
telemedicine, emergency department, patient satisfaction, patient-physician interaction, patient-nurse interaction, emergency department return visits, complementary care
MeSH terms
Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Male, New Jersey, Nurse-Patient Relations, Physician-Patient Relations, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review