Cited by 44Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsInnovations in Medical EducationSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning About Patient Safety: Organizational Context and Culture in the Education of Health Care Professionals

Open access
Pearson, Pauline, Steven, Alison, Howe, Amanda, Sheikh, Aziz, Ashcroft, Darren, Smith, Pam·2010·Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the formal and informal ways pre-registration students from medicine, nursing, physiotherapy and pharmacy learn about keeping patients safe. This paper gives an overview of the study and explores findings in relation to organizational context and culture. Methods: The study employed a phased design using multiple qualitative methods. The overall approach drew on ‘illuminative evaluation’. Ethical approval was obtained. Phase 1 employed a convenience sample of 13 pre-registration courses across the UK. Curriculum documents were gathered, and course directors interviewed. Phase 2 used eight case studies, two for each professional group, to develop an in-depth investigation of learning across university and practice by students and newly-qualified practitioners in relation to patient safety, and to examine the organizational culture that students and newly-qualified staff are exposed to. Analysis was iterative and ongoing throughout the study, using frameworks agreed by all researchers. Results: Patient safety was felt to have become a higher priority for the health care system in recent years. Incident reporting was a key feature of the patient safety agenda within the organizations examined. Staff were often unclear or too busy to report. On the whole, students were not engaged and may not be aware of incident reporting schemes. They may not have access to existing systems in their organization. Most did not access employers’ induction programmes. Some training sessions occasionally included students but this did not appear to be routine. Conclusions: Action is needed to develop an efficient interface between employers and education providers to develop up-to-date curricula for patient safety.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009052

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The case study approach can help develop or refine theory, as shown in the study of teaching patient safety in undergraduate curricula.

    “This in turn can help develop or refine theory, as shown in our study of the teaching of patient safety in undergraduate curricula (Table 4)[6,10].”

    From The case study approach (2011) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. DoH., 2006, Safety First - A Report for Patients, Clinicians and Healthcare Managers.
  2. 10.1001/jama.1994.03520230061039 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pearson, P., Steven, A., Howe, A., Sheikh, A., Ashcroft, D., & Smith, P.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
Published
2010-01
Volume
15
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
4-10
ISSN
  • 1355-8196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1060
OpenAlex
W2068277957
Cited by
44
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Services Research & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
patient safety, patient safety education, organizational culture, organizational context, pre-registration students, incident reporting, health professions education, course program, nursing students, medical students, pharmacy students, physiotherapy students
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Curriculum, Education, Professional, United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Risk Management, Schools, Health Occupations, State Medicine, Organizational Culture, Safety Management, Medical Errors, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review