The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetically modified plants and human health
Open accessAbstract
Summary Genetically modified (or GM) plants have attracted a large amount of media attention in recent years and continue to do so. Despite this, the general public remains largely unaware of what a GM plant actually is or what advantages and disadvantages the technology has to offer, particularly with regard to the range of applications for which they can be used. From the first generation of GM crops, two main areas of concern have emerged, namely risk to the environment and risk to human health. As GM plants are gradually being introduced into the European Union there is likely to be increasing public concern regarding potential health issues. Although it is now commonplace for the press to adopt ‘health campaigns’, the information they publish is often unreliable and unrepresentative of the available scientific evidence. We consider it important that the medical profession should be aware of the state of the art, and, as they are often the first port of call for a concerned patient, be in a position to provide an informed opinion. This review will examine how GM plants may impact on human health both directly – through applications targeted at nutrition and enhancement of recombinant medicine production – but also indirectly, through potential effects on the environment. Finally, it will examine the most important opposition currently facing the worldwide adoption of this technology: public opinion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several groups reviewing the evidence for health hazards of genetic modification have found no evidence for harms;130-134 however, methods for such evaluation remain heterogeneous.135-139”
From Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review (2016) · cites this paper as [131]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pushko, P., Pumpens, P., & Grens, E. (2013) · Intervirology · doi:10.1159/000346773 · Cited by 5,975
The State of Food Insecurity in the World
WFP, W. (2015) · Cited by 2,947
World development report 2000/2001 : attacking poverty
Kanbur, R., Calvo, C. M., Gupta, M. D., Grootaert, C. M., Kwakwa, V., & Lustig, N. C. (2001) · Cited by 2,753
Engineering the Provitamin A (β-Carotene) Biosynthetic Pathway into (Carotenoid-Free) Rice Endosperm
Ye, X., Al‐Babili, S., Klöti, A., Zhang, J., Lucca, P., Beyer, P., & Potrykus, I. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5451.303 · Cited by 2,270
Anderson, P. K., Cunningham, A. A., Patel, N., Morales, F. J., Epstein, P. R., & Daszak, P. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.021 · Cited by 1,717
Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations
Vinocur, B., & Altman, A. (2005) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2005.02.001 · Cited by 1,581
Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content
Paine, J. A., Shipton, C. A., Chaggar, S., Howells, R. M., Kennedy, M. J., Vernon, G., Wright, S. Y., Hinchliffe, E., Adams, J. L., Silverstone, A. L., et al. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1082 · Cited by 1,457
Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae
Losey, J. E., Rayor, L. S., & Carter, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20338 · Cited by 1,171
Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit
Zhang, H., & Blumwald, E. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/90824 · Cited by 1,123
Production of antibodies in transgenic plants
Hiatt, A., Caffferkey, R., & Bowdish, K. S. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/342076a0 · Cited by 1,065
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Ma JKC, 2003, Nature, 4, 794
- Byerlee D, 2000, Food Needs of the Developing World in the 21st Century, 207
- World Health Organisation, 2001, Combating vitamin A deficiency
- Brookes G, 2006, ISAAA briefs
- 2004, EFSA J, 99, 1
- FAO/WHO, 2001, Evaluation of Allergenicity of Genetically Modified Foods, Report of a joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Allergenicity of Foods derived from Biotechnology
- Doerfler W, 1997, Deutsches Arzteblatt, 94, 51
- WHO/FAO, 1991, Strategies for assessing the safety of foods produced by biotechnology. Report of the Joint WHO/FAO Consultation
- OECD, 1996, Food Safety Evaluation
- Sijmons PC, 1990, Biotechnology, 8, 217
- Stanley-Horn DE, 2001, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 119, 31
- Von Emden HF, GMOs – Ecological Dimensions
- Consumer Watch, 2003, GM Food and Farming: What are Consumer's latest views?
- Poortinga W, 2004, Public perceptions of Genetically Modified Food and Crops, and the GM nation?
- Gorden G, 2004, Scotsman
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mozaffarian, D. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.018585 · Cited by 2,216
Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects
Kumar, K., Gambhir, G., Dass, A., Tripathi, A. K., Singh, A., Jha, A., Yadava, P., Choudhary, M., & Rakshit, S. (2020) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03372-8 · Cited by 568
Ahluwalia, O., Singh, P. C., & Bhatia, R. (2021) · Resources Environment and Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100032 · Cited by 531
Advances in plant molecular farming
Obembe, O. O., Popoola, J. O., Leelavathi, S., & Reddy, S. V. (2010) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.004 · Cited by 283
A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants
Domingo, J. L., & Giné Bordonaba, J. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.003 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Key, S., Ma, J. K.-C., & Drake, P. M.
- Affiliations
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Centre for Infection, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, St George's University of LondonCranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK
- ORCID
- Drake, Pascal MW
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 290-298
- ISSN
- 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1095
- PMC
- PMC2408621
- OpenAlex
- W2101878382
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Transgenic Plants and Applications
- Keywords
- transgenic plants, genetically modified crops, human health, environmental risk, public perception, media coverage, nutrition, public opinion, medical profession
- MeSH terms
- Diet, Food Contamination, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Public Health, Public Opinion, Food, Genetically Modified
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
