Meta-analysis on COPD
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four reviews (3 meta-analyses and 1 narrative synthesis) analyzed the impact of telehealth on all-cause mortality, and none showed a significant difference versus usual care.
“A total of 4 reviews (3 meta-analyses and 1 narrative syntheses) analyzed the impact of telehealth on all-cause mortality, and none showed a significant difference versus usual care [65,66,68,69,71,72].”
Cites
Bourbeau, J. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.5.585 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Polisena, J., Tran, K., Cimon, K., Hutton, B., McGill, S., Palmer, K., & Scott, R. E. (2010) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2009.090812 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citationMcLean, S. C., & McKinstry, B. (2012) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1258/jtt.2012.110005 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hanlon, P., Daines, L., Campbell, C., McKinstry, B., Weller, D., & Pinnock, H. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6688 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
- Authors
- Polisena, J.
- Affiliations
- Canada's Drug Agency (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Polisena, Julie
- ORCID
- Polisena, Julie
- Venue
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 242-242
- ISSN
- 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1109
- OpenAlex
- W2334954848
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
