Cited by 64Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismRadiation Therapy and DosimetryEffects of Radiation Exposure

The Effect of Oxygen on the Response of Spontaneous Tumours in Mice to Radiotherapy

Du Sault, Lucille A.·1963·The British Journal of Radiology

Abstract

The cure rate of spontaneous mammary adenocarcinomas in C3H mice irradiated daily while breathing air can be increased by changing to treatment twice a week or by allowing the mice to breathe pure oxygen at three atmospheres during treatment. Pure oxygen at atmospheric pressure is no more effective than air, probably due to depression of the respiratory rate by the oxygen. Oxygen at either pressure markedly increases systemic effects, as shown by early deaths. A mixture of 95 per cent oxygen and 5 per cent carbon dioxide at three atmospheres has about the same effect as pure oxygen at the same pressure on both cure rate and systemic effects. Only the gas mixture at atmospheric pressure gives the increased cure rate (because the respiratory stimulation and vasodilation resulting from the carbon dioxide carries more oxygen to the tumour) without increasing normal tissue reactions over those of air. It is, then, the technique of choice among those investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1259/0007-1285-36-430-749

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carbogen improves blood flow and oxygenation more than pure oxygen because respiratory stimulation and vasodilation from carbon dioxide deliver more oxygen to the tumor.

    “Studies have shown that carbogen improves blood flow and oxygenation more than pure oxygen because respiratory stimulation and vasodilation from carbon dioxide deliver more oxygen to the tumor.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du Sault, L. A.
Venue
The British Journal of Radiology
Published
1963-10
Volume
36
Issue
430
Pages
749-754
ISSN
  • 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-880X
OpenAlex
W2154899058
Cited by
64
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
Keywords
hyperbaric oxygen therapy, radiotherapy, tumor hypoxia, respiratory stimulation, vasodilation, normal tissue response, C3H mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Carbon Dioxide, Humans, Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental, Neoplasms, Oxygen, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Research, Mammary Neoplasms, Animal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review