The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy
Abstract
The linear-quadratic (LQ) dose-effect formalism is currently providing new perspectives into the ways in which alterations in the dose per fraction in conventional radiotherapy may be used to bring about improved results with respect to early or late normal tissue reactions. In this paper, using a model initially developed by Roesch, the LQ equations are explored further in terms of dose-rate rather than dose. By the incorporation of one other parameter, mu, which relates to the rate of repair of sub-lethal radiation damage, a more general formalism is obtained. In particular, equations are derived which can be used to examine the relative effectiveness of different treatment regimes, including those involving decaying sources. Such equations are of wider applicability than other LQ derivations which relate only to dose-response relationships. The extended equations, which are fully consistent with the existing LQ method, are also shown to lead directly to other independently established, relationships for protracted irradiation. The nature of the link between high and low dose-rate treatments is discussed, and some worked examples provide indications of how the new equations may be used to assess further the potential clinical benefits of low dose-rate treatments and permanent implants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses
Barendsen, G. W. (1982) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(82)90459-x · Cited by 1,073
Thames, H. D., Rodney Withers, H., Peters, L. J., & Fletcher, G. H. (1982) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(82)90517-x · Cited by 840
Elkind, M. M., & Sutton, H. (2012) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rrav02.1 · Cited by 706
A simplification in the use of the NSD concept in practical radiotherapy
Orton, C. G., & Ellis, F. (1973) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/0007-1285-46-547-529 · Cited by 555
Elkind, M. M., & Sutton, H. (1960) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3570945 · Cited by 550
A molecular theory of cell survival
Chadwick, K. H., & Leenhouts, H. P. (1973) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/18/1/007 · Cited by 506
Radiation Dose-Rate: A Factor of Importance in Radiobiology and Radiotherapy
Hall, E. J. (1972) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/0007-1285-45-530-81 · Cited by 305
Cumulative radiation effect part I: Fractionated treatment regimes
Kirk, J., Gray, W. M., & Watson, E. R. (1971) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/s0009-9260(71)80044-2 · Cited by 270
Changes in the rate of repopulation during multifraction irradiation of mouse skin
Denekamp, J. (1973) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/0007-1285-46-545-381 · Cited by 241
Some Radiobiological Considerations in Radiotherapy
Lajtha, L. G., & Oliver, R. (1961) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/0007-1285-34-400-252 · Cited by 132
Cited by
Hobbs, R. F., McNutt, T., Baechler, S., He, B., Esaias, C. E., Frey, E. C., Loeb, D. M., Wahl, R. L., Shokek, O., & Sgouros, G. (2011) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.022 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Dale, R. G.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 690
- Pages
- 515-528
- ISSN
- 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-880X
- OpenAlex
- W2166406736
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 16.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/0007-1285-58-690-515
- The paper
- Dale, R. G. (1985). The application of the linear-quadratic dose-effect equation to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. The British Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-58-690-515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.