Cited by 53Advanced Radiotherapy TechniquesRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Treatment Planning Method for Sequentially Combining Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and External Radiation Therapy

Open access

Abstract

Purpose Effective cancer treatment generally requires combination therapy. The combination of external beam therapy (XRT) with radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) requires accurate three-dimensional dose calculations to avoid toxicity and evaluate efficacy. We have developed and tested a treatment planning method, using the patient-specific three-dimensional dosimetry package 3D-RD, for sequentially combined RPT/XRT therapy designed to limit toxicity to organs at risk.Methods and materials The biologic effective dose (BED) was used to translate voxelized RPT absorbed dose (D(RPT)) values into a normalized total dose (or equivalent 2-Gy-fraction XRT absorbed dose), NTD(RPT) map. The BED was calculated numerically using an algorithmic approach, which enabled a more accurate calculation of BED and NTD(RPT). A treatment plan from the combined Samarium-153 and external beam was designed that would deliver a tumoricidal dose while delivering no more than 50 Gy of NTD(sum) to the spinal cord of a patient with a paraspinal tumor.Results The average voxel NTD(RPT) to tumor from RPT was 22.6 Gy (range, 1-85 Gy); the maximum spinal cord voxel NTD(RPT) from RPT was 6.8 Gy. The combined therapy NTD(sum) to tumor was 71.5 Gy (range, 40-135 Gy) for a maximum voxel spinal cord NTD(sum) equal to the maximum tolerated dose of 50 Gy.Conclusions A method that enables real-time treatment planning of combined RPT-XRT has been developed. By implementing a more generalized conversion between the dose values from the two modalities and an activity-based treatment of partial volume effects, the reliability of combination therapy treatment planning has been expanded.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.022

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efforts to combine dose planning for radiopharmaceutical therapy of bone metastases with external beam radiation have been described for 153Sm-EDTMP.

    “Examples of efforts to combine dose planning for RPT of bone metastases with external beam radiation have been described for 153 Sm-EDTMP as an example ( 105 ).”

    From Normal-Tissue Tolerance to Radiopharmaceutical Therapies, the Knowns and the Unknowns (2021) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Introduction and Abstract Methods describe combined radiopharmaceutical and external-beam dose planning using samarium-153. The Methods section identifies the agent as 153Sm-EDTMP and notes its use for bone metastases, but the planning example is a patient with osteogenic sarcoma and a paraspinal tumor, not a case identified as bone metastases. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hobbs, R. F., McNutt, T., Baechler, S., He, B., Esaias, C. E., Frey, E. C., Loeb, D. M., Wahl, R. L., Shokek, O., & Sgouros, G.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Institute of Radiation Physics (CH)
Corresponding author
Sgouros, George
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
1256-1262
ISSN
0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165044684
Cited by
53
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA116477, CA116477)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
radiopharmaceutical therapy, external beam radiotherapy, treatment planning, 3D dosimetry, biologically effective dose, samarium-153, spinal cord dose, paraspinal tumors, partial volume effect
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Male, Organometallic Compounds, Organophosphorus Compounds, Radiation Injuries, Radioisotopes, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Samarium, Osteosarcoma, Spinal Cord, Spinal Neoplasms, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Organs at Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review