The DOI matches its Crossref record.
100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897–1997
Abstract
Radiologists and radiotherapists were one of the earliest occupational groups to be exposed to ionizing radiation. Their patterns of mortality provide information on the long-term effects of fractionated external radiation exposure. British radiologists who registered with a radiological society between 1897 and 1979 have now been followed-up until 1 January 1997, and the mortality experience examined among those who registered with a society after 1920, when the first radiological protection recommendations were published. The observed number of cancer deaths in those who registered after 1920 was similar to that expected from death rates for all medical practitioners combined (SMR=1.04; 95% CI 0.89-1.21). However, there was evidence of an increasing trend in risk of cancer mortality with time since first registration with a radiological society (p=0.002), such that in those registered for more than 40 years there was a 41% excess risk of cancer mortality (SMR=1.41; 95% CI 1.03-1.90). This is probably a long-term effect of radiation exposure in those who first registered during 1921-1935 and 1936-1954. There was no evidence of an increase in cancer mortality among radiologists who first registered after 1954, in whom radiation exposures are likely to have been lower. Non-cancer causes of death were also examined in more detail than has been reported previously. There was no evidence of an effect of radiation on diseases other than cancer even in the earliest radiologists, despite the fact that doses of the size received by them have been associated with more than a doubling in the death rate among the survivors of the Japanese atomic bombings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stewart, F. A., Akleyev, A. V., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hendry, J. H., Kleiman, N. J., MacVittie, T. J., Aleman, B. M., Edgar, A. B., Mabuchi, K., Muirhead, C. R., et al. (2012) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001 · Cited by 1,604
Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT
Hall, E. J., & Wuu, C.-S. (2003) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00073-7 · Cited by 1,301
Preston, D. L., Shimizu, Y., Pierce, D. A., Suyama, A., & Mabuchi, K. (2003) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3049 · Cited by 1,172
Shimizu, Y., Kodama, K., Nishi, N., Kasagi, F., Suyama, A., Soda, M., Grant, E. J., Sugiyama, H., Sakata, R., Moriwaki, H., et al. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b5349 · Cited by 531
Contents, preface, executive summary, chapters 1 and 2
Valentin, J. (2005) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2005.11.002 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Berrington, A., Darby, S. C., Weiss, H. A., & Doll, R.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 882
- Pages
- 507-519
- ISSN
- 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-880X
- OpenAlex
- W2152863867
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897–1997. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/bjr.74.882.740507
- The paper
- Berrington, A., Darby, S. C., Weiss, H. A., & Doll, R. (2001). 100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897–1997. The British Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.74.882.740507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.