The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations
Abstract
Monte Carlo simulations of CT examinations have been performed to estimate effective doses, normalized to axial air kerma, for six mathematical phantoms representing ages from newborn to adult, and for three CT scanner models covering a range of designs. Organ doses were calculated for CT exposures of contiguous, 1 cm wide, transverse slices in each phantom and summed to give normalized effective doses for scans of four regions of the trunk and head. In all cases an inverse trend is observed between normalized effective dose and phantom age, with the dose to the newborn from head and neck scans being 2.2-2.5 times higher than that to the adult, depending on scanner model. Corresponding increases for scans of the trunk region are more variable between scanners and range from a factor of 1.3 to 2.4. If typical clinical exposure conditions for adults are also utilized for children, then, for example, the effective dose to the newborn from a chest scan could be above 15 mSv. It is concluded that CT has the potential to deliver significantly greater radiation doses to children than to adults and in view of their greater susceptibility to radiation effects, special efforts should be made in clinical practice to reduce doses to children by the use of size-specific scan protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Brenner, D. J., Elliston, C. D., Hall, E. J., & Berdon, W. E. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 · Cited by 3,222 · cited 2×
“Effective dose has to be combined with risk factors in order to estimate health detriment, and various authors have estimated risk factors to be significantly greater for children than adults [5, 31].”
Background
Cited by
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Brenner, D. J., Elliston, C. D., Hall, E. J., & Berdon, W. E. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 · Cited by 3,222
Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries
de González, A. B., & Darby, S. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15433-0 · Cited by 1,718
Radiation Dose Modulation Techniques in the Multidetector CT Era: From Basics to Practice
Lee, C. H., Goo, J. M., Ye, H. J., Ye, S.-J., Park, C. M., Chun, E. J., & Im, J.-G. (2008) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.285075075 · Cited by 314
Han, B. K., Rigsby, C. K., Hlavacek, A., Leipsic, J., Nicol, E. D., Siegel, M. J., Bardo, D., Abbara, S., Ghoshhajra, B., Lesser, J. R., et al. (2015) · Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.004 · Cited by 211
Han, B. K., Rigsby, C. K., Leipsic, J., Bardo, D., Abbara, S., Ghoshhajra, B., Lesser, J. R., Raman, S. V., Crean, A. M., Nicol, E. D., et al. (2015) · Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.007 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Khursheed, A., Hillier, M. C., Shrimpton, P. C., & Wall, B. F.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 898
- Pages
- 819-830
- ISSN
- 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-880X
- OpenAlex
- W2153385421
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/bjr.75.898.750819
- The paper
- Khursheed, A., Hillier, M. C., Shrimpton, P. C., & Wall, B. F. (2002). Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. The British Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.75.898.750819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.