The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Cone beam CT (CBCT) is an emerging X-ray technology applied in dentomaxillofacial imaging. Previous published studies have estimated the effective dose and radiation risks using adult anthropomorphic phantoms for a wide range of CBCT units and imaging protocols. METHODS: Measurements were made five dental CBCT units for a range of imaging protocols, using 10-year-old and adolescent phantoms and thermoluminescent dosimeters. The purpose of the study was to estimate paediatric organ and effective doses from dental CBCT. RESULTS: The average effective doses to the 10-year-old and adolescent phantoms were 116 μSv and 79 μSv, respectively, which are similar to adult doses. The salivary glands received the highest organ dose and there was a fourfold increase in the thyroid dose of the 10-year-old relative to that of the adolescent because of its smaller size. The remainder tissues and salivary and thyroid glands contributed most significantly to the effective dose for a 10-year-old, whereas for an adolescent the remainder tissues and the salivary glands contributed the most significantly. It was found that the percentage attributable lifetime mortality risks were 0.002% and 0.001% for a 10-year-old and an adolescent patient, respectively, which are considerably higher than the risk to an adult having received the same doses. CONCLUSION: It is therefore imperative that dental CBCT examinations on children should be fully justified over conventional X-ray imaging and that dose optimisation by field of view collimation is particularly important in young children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preston, D. L., Shimizu, Y., Pierce, D. A., Suyama, A., & Mabuchi, K. (2003) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3049 · Cited by 1,172
Cited by
Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement
On behalf of the DIMITRA Research Group, H. D. B., Oenning, A. C., Jacobs, R., Pauwels, R., Stratis, A., Hedesiu, M., & Salmon, B. (2018) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Theodorakou, C., Walker, A., Horner, K., Pauwels, R., Bogaerts, R., Jacobs Dds, R., & The Sedentexct Project Consortium
- Venue
- The British Journal of Radiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1010
- Pages
- 153-160
- ISSN
- 0007-1285 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-880X
- OpenAlex
- W1989660091
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1259/bjr/19389412
- The paper
- Theodorakou, C., Walker, A., Horner, K., Pauwels, R., Bogaerts, R., Jacobs Dds, R., & The Sedentexct Project Consortium. (2012). Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. The British Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/19389412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.