Cited by 13Wood Treatment and PropertiesStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisStructural Engineering and Materials Analysis

Development of All-Wood Connections with Plywood Flitch Plate and Oak Pegs

Open access
Chang, Wen-Shao, Thomson, Andrew, Harris, Richard, Walker, Peter, Shanks, Jonathan·2011·Advances in Structural Engineering

Abstract

This paper proposes a new method for beam-beam connections, which include plywood as slot-in plates connected by oak pegs. A total of 96 specimens were fabricated for tests to explore the minimum required end distances and spacing between pegs parallel to the grain. A new failure mode, termed shear wedge that is different from those found in previous research, was found. A spring model was also proposed in this study to investigate the stiffness of the connections, and feasibility of EC5 to be applied on the new proposed connections was also examined. The effective number was discussed in this study and modified in accordance to the experimental results. The result of this study shows the new connections proposed do not lead to brittle failure unless failure in plywood occurred.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1260/1369-4332.14.2.123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Canadian Standards Association (1994). Engineering design in wood (Limit State Design) . A national Standard of Canada. CSA 086:1-94. Cointe A., Rouger F. (2005). Improving the evaluation of multiple-dowel-type connection strength. Wood Science and Technology . V ol. 39, No. 4, pp.259-269. Daudeville L., Davenne L., Yasumura M. (1999). Prediction of the load carrying capacity of bolted timber joints. Wood Science and Technology . V ol. 33, No. 1,
  2. Larsen H.J (1973). The yield load of bolted and nailed connections. Proceedings of 8
  3. MacKay R.B. (1997). Timber frame tension joinery . Master Thesis, University of 13
  4. Murty B., Smith I., Asiz A. (2007). Wood and engineered wood product connections using small steel tube fasteners: Applicability of European Yield Model. Journal of
  5. Sandberg L.B.; Bulleit W.M.; Reid E.H. (2000). The strength and stiffness of oak pegs in traditional timber frame joints. Journal of Structural Engineering , V ol. 126, No. 6, pp.717-723.
  6. Smith I., Foliente G., Nguyen M., Syme M. (2005). Capacities of dowel-type fastener joints in Australian Pine. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering . V ol. 17, No. 6, pp. 664-675.

Authors
Chang, W.-S., Thomson, A., Harris, R., Walker, P., & Shanks, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • Ramboll (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Ramboll, Cambridge, UK
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Chang, Wen-Shao
Venue
Advances in Structural Engineering
Published
2011-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
123-131
ISSN
  • 1369-4332 (ISSN-L)
  • 2048-4011
OpenAlex
W2107001846
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Structural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
Keywords
connection stiffness, spring model, brittle failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review