Cited by 187Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education ResearchSports Performance and Training

Manipulating constraints to train decision making in rugby union

Passos, Pedro, Araújo, Duarte, Davids, Keith, Shuttleworth, Richard·2008·International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Abstract

This paper focuses on the paradoxical relationship between game unpredictability and the certainty of players' actions in team ball sports. Our research on this relationship leads us to suggest a method for training decision making, which we exemplify in the team sport of Rugby Union. The training methodology is based on application of theoretical insights from Ecological Psychology Complex Dynamical Systems and the Constraints-Led Approach. The paper starts with a critical overview of traditional approaches to studying decision making in sport. Next we describe the sport of Rugby Union to exemplify a complex dynamical system, and explain how that conceptualisation captures the interactions of players within that performance context. We conclude our analysis by describing how to manipulate task constraints to improve decision-making performance, as players search for an appropriate blend of stability and variability in their actions. In the final part of the paper, we suggest some methods to train decision making based on four stages: I) identifying the problem; ii) setting out a strategy to solve it; iii) creating an action model; and iv) building a decision-making exercise. The main conclusion from our work for coaches and sports scientists is that decision making should be improved through training methods that provide an accurate balance between stability of actions, which gives structure to the players' performance, and variability which allows them to cope with the uncertainty of situational constraints, such as the behaviour of specific opponents

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1260/174795408784089432

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passos, P., Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Shuttleworth, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (PT)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Skill Acquisition Section, Australian Institute of Sport, Australia
Corresponding author
Passos, Pedro
Venue
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2008-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
125-140
ISSN
  • 1747-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 2048-397X
OpenAlex
W2070611110
Cited by
187
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
rugby union, decision-making in sport, constraints-led approach, ecological psychology, complex dynamical systems, task constraints, team ball sports, decision-making training, action models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review