The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The two Gtsf paralogs in silkworms orthogonally activate their partner PIWI proteins for target cleavage
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) pathway is a protection mechanism against transposons in animal germ cells. Most PIWI proteins possess piRNA-guided endonuclease activity, which is critical for silencing transposons and producing new piRNAs. Gametocyte-specific factor 1 (Gtsf1), an evolutionarily conserved zinc finger protein, promotes catalysis by PIWI proteins. Many animals have multiple Gtsf1 paralogs; however, their respective roles in the piRNA pathway are not fully understood. Here, we dissected the roles of Gtsf1 and its paralog Gtsf1-like (Gtsf1L) in the silkworm piRNA pathway. We found that Gtsf1 and Gtsf1L preferentially bind the two silkworm PIWI paralogs, Siwi and BmAgo3, respectively, and facilitate the endonuclease activity of each PIWI protein. This orthogonal activation effect was further supported by specific reduction of BmAgo3-bound Masculinizer piRNA and Siwi-bound Feminizer piRNA, the unique piRNA pair required for silkworm feminization, upon depletion of Gtsf1 and Gtsf1L, respectively. Our results indicate that the two Gtsf paralogs in silkworms activate their respective PIWI partners, thereby facilitating the amplification of piRNAs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03856-x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000764 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-022-05009-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009194 · DOI
- 10.15252/embr.202051342 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10547 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-017-00854-4 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.221150.113 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12864-018-4933-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1140494 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00052-5 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa1264 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature20162 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.030 · DOI
- 10.1002/wrna.1716 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108914 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034258 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.008 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-1966-9 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.1452209 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.2709411 · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.659307 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-0716-1633-8_3 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13315 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.027 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aaa1039 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.013 · DOI
- 10.15252/embj.2020105130 · DOI
- 10.15252/embr.201744957 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.221515.113 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.05.012 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41576-018-0073-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature10672 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.1563607 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0150390 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.10.016 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1214046110 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.1733 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.003 · DOI
- 10.15252/embr.201642054 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1038/cr.2017.125 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Izumi, N., Shoji, K., Kiuchi, T., Katsuma, S., & Tomari, Y.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Tomari, Yukihide
- Venue
- RNA
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2022-11-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-29
- ISSN
- 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9001
- PMC
- PMC9808576
- OpenAlex
- W4307851397
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- RNA (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (S10 OD018174)
- Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (18H05271, 19K06484)
- Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (17H06431)
- Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists (22K15082)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- transposon silencing, Bombyx mori, germ cells, zinc finger proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review