Cited by 83RNA modifications and cancerRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA regulation and disease

A domain of the actin binding protein Abp140 is the yeast methyltransferase responsible for 3-methylcytidine modification in the tRNA anti-codon loop

Open access
D'Silva, Sonia, Haider, Steffen J., Phizicky, Eric M.·2011·RNA

Abstract

The 3-methylcytidine (m 3 C) modification is widely found in eukaryotic species of tRNA Ser, tRNA Thr, and tRNA Arg; at residue 32 in the anti-codon loop; and at residue e2 in the variable stem of tRNA Ser. Little is known about the function of this modification or about the specificity of the corresponding methyltransferase, since the gene has not been identified. We have used a primer extension assay to screen a battery of methyltransferase candidate knockout strains in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and find that tRNA Thr(IGU) from abp140-Δ strains lacks m 3 C. Curiously, Abp140p is composed of a poorly conserved N-terminal ORF fused by a programed +1 frameshift in budding yeasts to a C-terminal ORF containing an S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) domain that is highly conserved among eukaryotes. We show that ABP140 is required for m 3 C modification of substrate tRNAs, since primer extension is similarly affected for all tRNA species expected to have m 3 C and since quantitative analysis shows explicitly that tRNA Thr(IGU) from an abp140-Δ strain lacks m 3 C. We also show that Abp140p (now named Trm140p) purified after expression in yeast or Escherichia coli has m 3 C methyltransferase activity, which is specific for tRNA Thr(IGU) and not tRNA Phe and occurs specifically at C 32. We suggest that the C-terminal ORF of Trm140p is necessary and sufficient for activity in vivo and in vitro, based on analysis of constructs deleted for most or all of the N-terminal ORF. We also suggest that m 3 C has a role in translation, since trm140-Δ trm1-Δ strains (also lacking m 2,2 G 26) are sensitive to low concentrations of cycloheximide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1261/rna.2652611

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The catalytic mutants of METTL8 failed to recruit ASCC3 to nucleoli.

    “Conversely, two catalytic mutations targeting the putative SAM-binding domain of METTL8 (D’Silva et al., 2011; Noma et al., 2011) (G204A/G206A and D230A; Supplemental Figure S2a–S2c) failed to recruit ASCC3 to nucleoli”

    From Aberrant RNA methylation triggers recruitment of an alkylation repair complex (2021) · cites this paper as D’Silva et al., 2011

    The citation is attached to the description of a putative SAM-binding domain, not directly to the recruitment result. The Discussion describes a conserved SAM-methyltransferase domain in yeast Trm140p, but our copy does not address METTL8 catalytic mutants, ASCC3, or nucleolar recruitment (searched those terms and the specified mutations). (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Silva, S., Haider, S. J., & Phizicky, E. M.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
RNA
Published
2011-04-25
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1100-1110
ISSN
  • 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9001
OpenAlex
W2097843864
Cited by
83
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RNA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Cancer Research UK
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM52347, R01GM052347)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
tRNA modification, methyltransferase, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, translation (biology), cycloheximide sensitivity
MeSH terms
Anticodon, Cytidine, Microfilament Proteins, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Transfer, tRNA Methyltransferases, S-Adenosylmethionine, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review