The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NMR structure of the apoB mRNA stem–loop and its interaction with the C to U editing APOBEC1 complementary factor
Abstract
We have solved the NMR structure of the 31-nucleotide (nt) apoB mRNA stem–loop, a substrate of the cytidine deaminase APOBEC1. We found that the edited base located at the 5′ end of the octa-loop is stacked between two adenosines in both the unedited (cytidine 6666) and the edited (uridine 6666) forms and that the rest of the loop is unstructured. The 11-nt “mooring” sequence essential for editing is partially flexible although it is mostly in the stem of the RNA. The octa-loop and the internal loop in the middle of the stem confer this flexibility. These findings shed light on why APOBEC1 alone cannot edit efficiently the cytidine 6666 under physiological conditions, the editing base being buried in the loop and not directly accessible. We also show that APOBEC1 does not specifically bind apoB mRNA and requires the auxiliary factor, APOBEC1 complementary factor (ACF), to edit specifically cytidine 6666. The binding of ACF to both the mooring sequence and APOBEC1 explains the specificity of the reaction. Our NMR study lead us to propose a mechanism in which ACF recognizes first the flexible nucleotides of the mooring sequence (the internal loop and the 3′ end octa-loop) and subsequently melts the stem–loop, exposing the amino group of the cytidine 6666 to APOBEC1. Thus, the flexibility of the mooring sequence plays a central role in the RNA recognition by ACF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The RNA editing by A1 + A1CF was previously reported to require a so-called mooring sequence that has a general stem-loop structure around the target C and contains relatively high U/G/A content downstream of the target C33,34.”
From The roles of APOBEC-mediated RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 mutations, replication and fitness (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Prior reports show that some cellular RNA targets with stem-loop structures are favored by A3A and A1 editing25,28,34,54.”
From The roles of APOBEC-mediated RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 mutations, replication and fitness (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1074/jbc.270.24.14762 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/20.22.6007 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M107654200 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M006435200 · DOI
- 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 15701, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84889-5 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4691 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.3659919 · DOI
- 1990, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 6811, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39221-X · DOI
- 10.1261/rna.7490704 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M306874200 · DOI
- 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 13395, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)80008-4 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja981513x · DOI
- 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 19843, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32097-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90432-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 7288
- 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 5932, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)37551-8 · DOI
- 1993, J. Lipid Res., 34, 1367, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)36966-2 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1284 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/22.10.1874 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9435 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.49.34590 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.5.2353 · DOI
- 10.1006/geno.2002.6718 · DOI
- 1996, J. Mol. Graph., 14:, 29
- 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 20550, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54960-7 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.24.14768 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355838202015649 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.20.5.1846-1854.2000 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.22.19.6726-6734.2002 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1589782 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.270.22.13042 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.90.1.222 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90328-3 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1506 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1020632900961 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90510-1 · DOI
- Price, S.R., Oubridge, C., Varani, G., and Nagai, K. 1998. Preparation of RNA–protein complexes for X-ray crystallography and NMR. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.48.31707 · DOI
- 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 16301, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55296-0 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M307920200 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4484 · DOI
- 1992, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 21265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)36827-9 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.8511591 · DOI · Paper page
- 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 29395, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)43892-6 · DOI
- 1998, Progr. NMR Spectrosc., 32, 287, 10.1016/S0079-6565(97)00023-X · DOI
- 10.1006/jmre.1999.1797 · DOI
- Wüthrich, K. 1986. NMR of proteins and nucleic acids. John Wiley & Sons, New York. · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1291 · DOI
- 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 21725, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)31865-3 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.271.19.11506 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355838202014061 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The roles of APOBEC-mediated RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 mutations, replication and fitness
Kim, K., Calabrese, P., Wang, S., Qin, C., Rao, Y., Feng, P., & Chen, X. S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19067-x · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- MARIS, C., MASSE, J., CHESTER, A., NAVARATNAM, N., & ALLAIN, F. H.-T.
- Venue
- RNA
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2005-01-18
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-186
- ISSN
- 1355-8382
- 1469-9001
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review