The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer risk: An update meta-analysis of cohort studies
Abstract
Background & Objective: The results of epidemiologic studies on the relationship between the coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer risk were inconsistent. Thus, we performed an update meta-analysis of cohort studies to quantitatively summarize the association between coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer risk.Methods: We searched CBM (China Biology Medicine disc) and MEDLINE for studies of coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer risk up to June 2015. A total of 20 cohort studies were identified in this meta-analysis, and we analyzed these studies using random effects model. The dose-response analysis was conducted too.Results: The overall relative risk (RR) for highest coffee consumption versus lowest coffee consumption was 0.75 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.63-0.86). Statistic significant heterogeneity was found among these studies (I2 =37.8%, P for heterogeneity =0.045). The pooled RR for increment of 1 cup/day of coffee consumption was 0.99 (95%CI, 0.96-1.03) for the nine studies, without statistically significant.Conclusions: High coffee consumption is associated with a reduced pancreatic cancer risk. However, the result should be accepted with caution, due to the potential confounder and bias could not be excluded. Further well designed studies are needed to confirm the finding.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8761How to cite this:Ran HQ, Wang JZ, Sun CQ. Coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer risk: An update meta-analysis of cohort studies. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(1):253-259.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other prospective studies and meta-analyses also reported a decreased risk of pancreatic cancer associated with high coffee consumption [174].”
From Effects of Coffee on the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: A Narrative Review and Literature Update (2022) · cites this paper as [174]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kempf, K., Herder, C., Erlund, I., Kolb, H., Martin, S., Carstensen, M., Koenig, W., Sundvall, J., Bidel, S., Kuha, S., et al. (2010) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28548 · Cited by 364
Coffee Drinking, Mortality, and Cancer Incidence: Results From a Norwegian Prospective Study 2
(1986) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/76.5.823 · Cited by 218
Cited by
Effects of Coffee on the Gastro-Intestinal Tract: A Narrative Review and Literature Update
Nehlig, A. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14020399 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Ran, H.-Q., Wang, J.-Z., & Sun, C.-Q.
- Venue
- Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
- Publisher
- Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
- Published
- 2016-01-21
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1681-715X
- 1682-024X
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
