Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 614

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RNA-seq analysis is easy as 1-2-3 with limma, Glimma and edgeR

Open access
Law, Charity W., Alhamdoosh, Monther, Su, Shian, Dong, Xueyi, Tian, Luyi, Smyth, Gordon K., Ritchie, Matthew E.·2018·F1000Research

Abstract

The ability to easily and efficiently analyse RNA-sequencing data is a key strength of the Bioconductor project. Starting with counts summarised at the gene-level, a typical analysis involves pre-processing, exploratory data analysis, differential expression testing and pathway analysis with the results obtained informing future experiments and validation studies. In this workflow article, we analyse RNA-sequencing data from the mouse mammary gland, demonstrating use of the popular edgeR package to import, organise, filter and normalise the data, followed by the limma package with its voom method, linear modelling and empirical Bayes moderation to assess differential expression and perform gene set testing. This pipeline is further enhanced by the Glimma package which enables interactive exploration of the results so that individual samples and genes can be examined by the user. The complete analysis offered by these three packages highlights the ease with which researchers can turn the raw counts from an RNA-sequencing experiment into biological insights using Bioconductor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12688/f1000research.9005.3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2016, Mus.musculus: Annotation package for the Mus.musculus object., 10.18129/B9.bioc.Mus.musculus · doi:10.18129/b9.bioc.mus.musculus
  2. 2016, Homo.sapiens: Annotation package for the Homo.sapiens object., 10.18129/B9.bioc.Homo.sapiens · doi:10.18129/b9.bioc.homo.sapiens

Cited by

See all 614

Metadata

Authors
Law, C. W., Alhamdoosh, M., Su, S., Dong, X., Tian, L., Smyth, G. K., & Ritchie, M. E.
Venue
F1000Research
Published
2018-12-28
Volume
5
Pages
1408
ISSN
2046-1402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2429031812
Cited by
614
References
24
FWCI
21.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1058892, GNT1054618, GNT1104924)
  • Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS
  • State Government Operational Infrastructure Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RNA-seq analysis is easy as 1-2-3 with limma, Glimma and edgeR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.12688/f1000research.9005.3
The paper
Law, C. W., Alhamdoosh, M., Su, S., Dong, X., Tian, L., Smyth, G. K., & Ritchie, M. E. (2018). RNA-seq analysis is easy as 1-2-3 with limma, Glimma and edgeR. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9005.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.