Cited by 481Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsProtein purification and stability

Recent advances in (therapeutic protein) drug development

Open access
Lagassé, H.A. Daniel, Alexaki, Aikaterini, Simhadri, Vijaya L., Katagiri, Nobuko H., Jankowski, Wojciech, Sauna, Zuben E., Kimchi-Sarfaty, Chava·2017·F1000Research

Abstract

Therapeutic protein drugs are an important class of medicines serving patients most in need of novel therapies. Recently approved recombinant protein therapeutics have been developed to treat a wide variety of clinical indications, including cancers, autoimmunity/inflammation, exposure to infectious agents, and genetic disorders. The latest advances in protein-engineering technologies have allowed drug developers and manufacturers to fine-tune and exploit desirable functional characteristics of proteins of interest while maintaining (and in some cases enhancing) product safety or efficacy or both. In this review, we highlight the emerging trends and approaches in protein drug development by using examples of therapeutic proteins approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration over the previous five years (2011–2016, namely January 1, 2011, through August 31, 2016).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12688/f1000research.9970.1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With such high-expression yields in flasks, production of antibody fragments would not require scale-up to bioreactors during drug development.

    “With such high-expression yields in the flasks, the production of antibody fragments would not require a scale-up to bioreactors during the drug development process [129].”

    From Evolution of Escherichia coli Expression System in Producing Antibody Recombinant Fragments (2020) · cites this paper as [129]

    The Protein engineering section discusses the complexity of therapeutic-protein manufacturing, but does not address antibody-fragment yields in flasks or whether those yields eliminate bioreactor scale-up. Searches for those terms and for flask production without scale-up found no passage supporting the claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. [1]Kimchi-Sarfaty C Schiller T Hamasaki-Katagiri N: Building better drugs: developing and regulating engineered therapeutic proteins. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013; 34(10): 534– 48. 10.1016/j.tips.2013.08.005 24060103 · DOI
  2. [2]Carter PJ: Introduction to current and future protein therapeutics: a protein engineering perspective. Exp Cell Res. 2011; 317(9): 1261– 9. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.02.013 21371474 · DOI
  3. [3]Walsh G: Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2014. Nat Biotechnol. 2014; 32(10): 992– 1000. 10.1038/nbt.3040 25299917 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Schellekens H: Biosimilar therapeutics-what do we need to consider? NDT Plus. 2009; 2(Suppl_1): i27– i36. 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn177 19461855 PMC2638545 · DOI
  5. [5]Bandaranayake AD Almo SC: Recent advances in mammalian protein production. FEBS Lett. 2014; 588(2): 253– 60. 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.11.035 24316512 PMC3924552 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Butler M Meneses-Acosta A: Recent advances in technology supporting biopharmaceutical production from mammalian cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012; 96(4): 885– 94. 10.1007/s00253-012-4451-z 23053101 PMC7080107 · DOI
  7. [7]Zhu J: Mammalian cell protein expression for biopharmaceutical production. Biotechnol Adv. 2012; 30(5): 1158– 70. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.022 21968146 · DOI
  8. [8]Cipriano D Burnham M Hughes JV: Effectiveness of various processing steps for viral clearance of therapeutic proteins: database analyses of commonly used steps. Methods Mol Biol. 2012; 899: 277– 92. 10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_18 22735960 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  9. [9]Chirino AJ Mire-Sluis A: Characterizing biological products and assessing comparability following manufacturing changes. Nat Biotechnol. 2004; 22(11): 1383– 91. 10.1038/nbt1030 15529163 · DOI
  10. [10]Tobin PH Richards DH Callender RA: Protein engineering: a new frontier for biological therapeutics. Curr Drug Metab. 2014; 15(7): 743– 56. 10.2174/1389200216666141208151524 25495737 PMC4931902 · DOI
  11. [11]Wurm FM: Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2004; 22(11): 1393– 8. 10.1038/nbt1026 15529164 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [12]Lutz S: Beyond directed evolution--semi-rational protein engineering and design. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010; 21(6): 734– 43. 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.08.011 20869867 PMC2982887 · DOI
  13. [13]Levin D Golding B Strome SE: Fc fusion as a platform technology: potential for modulating immunogenicity. Trends Biotechnol. 2015; 33(1): 27– 34. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.11.001 25488117 · DOI
  14. [14]Rath T Baker K Dumont JA: Fc-fusion proteins and FcRn: structural insights for longer-lasting and more effective therapeutics. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2015; 35(2): 235– 54. 10.3109/07388551.2013.834293 24156398 PMC4876602 · DOI
  15. [15]Andersen JT Pehrson R Tolmachev V: Extending half-life by indirect targeting of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) using a minimal albumin binding domain. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286(7): 5234– 41. 10.1074/jbc.M110.164848 21138843 PMC3037636 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  16. [16]Turecek PL Bossard MJ Schoetens F: PEGylation of Biopharmaceuticals: A Review of Chemistry and Nonclinical Safety Information of Approved Drugs. J Pharm Sci. 2016; 105(2): 460– 75. 10.1016/j.xphs.2015.11.015 26869412 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [17]Strohl WR: Fusion Proteins for Half-Life Extension of Biologics as a Strategy to Make Biobetters. BioDrugs. 2015; 29(4): 215– 39. 10.1007/s40259-015-0133-6 26177629 PMC4562006 · DOI
  18. [18]Coppola A Di Capua M De Simone C: Primary prophylaxis in children with haemophilia. Blood Transfus. 2008; 6(Suppl 2): s4– 11. 19105503 PMC2652217
  19. [19]Casi G Neri D: Antibody-drug conjugates: basic concepts, examples and future perspectives. J Control Release. 2012; 161(2): 422– 8. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.026 22306430 · DOI
  20. [21]Costa AR Rodrigues ME Henriques M: Glycosylation: impact, control and improvement during therapeutic protein production. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014; 34(4): 281– 99. 10.3109/07388551.2013.793649 23919242 · DOI
  21. [24]Schieppati A Henter JI Daina E: Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. Lancet. 2008; 371(9629): 2039– 41. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60872-7 18555915 · DOI
  22. [26]Roger SD: Biosimilars: current status and future directions. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010; 10(7): 1011– 8. 10.1517/14712591003796553 20384525 · DOI
  23. [34]Schellekens H Moors E: Clinical comparability and European biosimilar regulations. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(1): 28– 31. 10.1038/nbt0110-28 20062035 · DOI
  24. [35]Walsh G: Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2010. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(9): 917– 24. 10.1038/nbt0910-917 20829826 · DOI
  25. [39]Shankar G Pendley C Stein KE: A risk-based bioanalytical strategy for the assessment of antibody immune responses against biological drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25(5): 555– 61. 10.1038/nbt1303 17483842 · DOI
  26. [40]Yin L Chen X Vicini P: Therapeutic outcomes, assessments, risk factors and mitigation efforts of immunogenicity of therapeutic protein products. Cell Immunol. 2015; 295(2): 118– 26. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.03.002 25880103 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  27. [41]Maertens B Spriestersbach A von Groll U: Gene optimization mechanisms: a multi-gene study reveals a high success rate of full-length human proteins expressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 2010; 19(7): 1312– 26. 10.1002/pro.408 20506237 PMC2970903 · DOI
  28. [42]Mauro VP Chappell SA: A critical analysis of codon optimization in human therapeutics. Trends Mol Med. 2014; 20(11): 604– 13. 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.09.003 25263172 PMC4253638 F1000 Recommendation · DOI · Paper page
  29. [43]Hunt R Sauna ZE Ambudkar SV: Silent (synonymous) SNPs: should we care about them? Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 578: 23– 39. 10.1007/978-1-60327-411-1_2 19768585 · DOI
  30. [44]Tsai C Sauna ZE Kimchi-Sarfaty C: Synonymous mutations and ribosome stalling can lead to altered folding pathways and distinct minima. J Mol Biol. 2008; 383(2): 281– 91. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.012 18722384 PMC2628389 · DOI
  31. [45]Sauna ZE Kimchi-Sarfaty C: Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12(10): 683– 91. 10.1038/nrg3051 21878961 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [46]Houdebine LM: Production of pharmaceutical proteins by transgenic animals. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009; 32(2): 107– 21. 10.1016/j.cimid.2007.11.005 18243312 PMC7112688 · DOI
  33. [47]van Veen HA Koiter J Vogelezang CJ: Characterization of recombinant human C1 inhibitor secreted in milk of transgenic rabbits. J Biotechnol. 2012; 162(2–3): 319– 26. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.09.005 22995741 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  34. [48]Hellwig S Drossard J Twyman RM: Plant cell cultures for the production of recombinant proteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2004; 22(11): 1415– 22. 10.1038/nbt1027 15529167 · DOI
  35. [49]Grabowski GA Golembo M Shaaltiel Y: Taliglucerase alfa: an enzyme replacement therapy using plant cell expression technology. Mol Genet Metab. 2014; 112(1): 1– 8. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.02.011 24630271 · DOI
  36. [50]Fox JL: First plant-made biologic approved. Nat Biotech. 2012; 30(6): 472 10.1038/nbt0612-472 · DOI
  37. [51]Mössner E Brünker P Moser S: Increasing the efficacy of CD20 antibody therapy through the engineering of a new type II anti-CD20 antibody with enhanced direct and immune effector cell-mediated B-cell cytotoxicity. Blood. 2010; 115(22): 4393– 402. 10.1182/blood-2009-06-225979 20194898 PMC2881503 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  38. [52]Peters RT Low SC Kamphaus GD: Prolonged activity of factor IX as a monomeric Fc fusion protein. Blood. 2010; 115(10): 2057– 64. 10.1182/blood-2009-08-239665 20056791 · DOI
  39. [53]Dumont JA Liu T Low SC: Prolonged activity of a recombinant factor VIII-Fc fusion protein in hemophilia A mice and dogs. Blood. 2012; 119(13): 3024– 30. 10.1182/blood-2011-08-367813 22246033 PMC3953019 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  40. [54]Powell JS Josephson NC Quon D: Safety and prolonged activity of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in hemophilia A patients. Blood. 2012; 119(13): 3031– 7. 10.1182/blood-2011-09-382846 22223821 PMC3646317 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  41. [55]Pelegri-O'Day EM Lin EW Maynard HD: Therapeutic protein-polymer conjugates: advancing beyond PEGylation. J Am Chem Soc. 2014; 136(41): 14323– 32. 10.1021/ja504390x 25216406 F1000 Recommendation · DOI · Paper page
  42. [62]Moreland L Bate G Kirkpatrick P: Abatacept. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006; 5(3): 185– 6. 10.1038/nrd1989 16557658 · DOI
  43. [63]Kirk AD Harlan DM Armstrong NN: CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD40 ligand prevent renal allograft rejection in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(16): 8789– 94. 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8789 9238056 PMC23132 · DOI
  44. [64]Levisetti MG Padrid PA Szot GL: Immunosuppressive effects of human CTLA4Ig in a non-human primate model of allogeneic pancreatic islet transplantation. J Immunol. 1997; 159(11): 5187– 91. 9548454
  45. [65]Larsen CP Pearson TC Adams AB: Rational development of LEA29Y (belatacept), a high-affinity variant of CTLA4-Ig with potent immunosuppressive properties. Am J Transplant. 2005; 5(3): 443– 53. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00749.x 15707398 · DOI
  46. [66]Vincenti F Charpentier B Vanrenterghem Y: A phase III study of belatacept-based immunosuppression regimens versus cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients (BENEFIT study). Am J Transplant. 2010; 10(3): 535– 46. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.03005.x 20415897 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  47. [67]Vincenti F Dritselis A Kirkpatrick P: Belatacept. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011; 10: 655– 6. 10.1038/nrd3536 21878974 · DOI
  48. [68]Pescovitz MD: Rituximab, an anti-cd20 monoclonal antibody: history and mechanism of action. Am J Transplant. 2006; 6(5 Pt 1): 859– 66. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01288.x 16611321 · DOI
  49. [69]Reff ME Carner K Chambers KS: Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20. Blood. 1994; 83(2): 435– 45. 7506951
  50. [70]Jiang XR Song A Bergelson S: Advances in the assessment and control of the effector functions of therapeutic antibodies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011; 10(2): 101– 11. 10.1038/nrd3365 21283105 · DOI
  51. [71]Nelson AL Dhimolea E Reichert JM: Development trends for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010; 9(10): 767– 74. 10.1038/nrd3229 20811384 · DOI
  52. [72]Beck A: Biosimilar, biobetter and next generation therapeutic antibodies. MAbs. 2011; 3(2): 107– 10. 10.4161/mabs.3.2.14785 21285536 PMC3092613 · DOI
  53. [73]Niwa R Satoh M: The current status and prospects of antibody engineering for therapeutic use: focus on glycoengineering technology. J Pharm Sci. 2015; 104(3): 930– 41. 10.1002/jps.24316 25583555 · DOI
  54. [74]Herter S Birk MC Klein C: Glycoengineering of therapeutic antibodies enhances monocyte/macrophage-mediated phagocytosis and cytotoxicity. J Immunol. 2014; 192(5): 2252– 60. 10.4049/jimmunol.1301249 24489098 PMC3932809 F1000 Recommendation · DOI
  55. [75]Ferrara C Grau S Jäger C: Unique carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions are required for high affinity binding between FcgammaRIII and antibodies lacking core fucose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(31): 12669– 74. 10.1073/pnas.1108455108 21768335 PMC3150898 F1000 Recommendation · DOI · Paper page
  56. [76]Goede V Fischer K Busch R: Obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(12): 1101– 10. 10.1056/NEJMoa1313984 24401022 F1000 Recommendation · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lagassé, H. A. D., Alexaki, A., Simhadri, V. L., Katagiri, N. H., Jankowski, W., Sauna, Z. E., & Kimchi-Sarfaty, C.
Affiliations
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (US)
Corresponding author
Sauna, Zuben E.
Venue
F1000Research
Published
2017-02-07
Volume
6
Pages
113
ISSN
2046-1402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586724023
Cited by
481
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 5
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • F1000Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
therapeutic proteins, recombinant therapeutic proteins, protein engineering, FDA-approved drugs, drug development, cancer therapy, infectious disease exposure, genetic disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review