Cited by 0Linguistics and language evolutionNatural Language Processing TechniquesPhonetics and Phonology Research

Using feature vectors for automated phonological reconstruction and reflex prediction

Open access
Wientzek, Tim·2025·Open Research Europe

Abstract

Introduction In recent years, automated phonological reconstruction and cognate reflex prediction have significantly evolved. Yet, these tasks remain a key challenge in computational historical linguistics due to data sparsity and the complexity of phonological systems. This paper introduces the Feature Vector Transformer (FeVeT), a new approach that addresses these limitations by representing phonological segments as structured feature vectors rather than discrete symbols. Methods The proposed model uses a Transformer-based encoder-decoder architecture to generate reflexes or proto-forms from cognate sets. Input characters are encoded as phonological feature vectors, incorporating language and positional information. The model is trained to predict both phonological features and IPA symbols simultaneously, enabling robust and interpretable outputs without requiring sequence alignment or trimming. Results FeVeT achieves state-of-the-art performance on both reflex prediction and proto-language reconstruction tasks across multiple datasets. Ablation studies confirm the importance of feature-based input representations, and pre-training on reflex prediction data improves generalization in the reconstruction task. Discussion The use of feature vectors enables FeVeT to capture fine-grained phonological patterns and generalize across languages with sparse training data. The model outperforms prior encoder-decoder and position-wise classification architectures in most settings. Challenges remain with irregular changes such as metathesis and reconstructing proto-forms in high test-proportion or zero-shot settings. Suggestions for future work include integrating phylogenetic information into language embeddings and refining pre-training strategies. Conclusion FeVeT represents a step forward in computational approaches to phonological reconstruction and reflex prediction. By incorporating phonological feature representations, it improves performance under data-sparse conditions, highlighting the potential of feature-based representations for future advances in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12688/openreseurope.20647.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wientzek, T.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Wientzek, Tim
Venue
Open Research Europe
Publisher
CERN
Published
2025-06-30
ISSN
2732-5121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411787216
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Open Research Europe (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (834050)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
phonological reconstruction, transformer encoder-decoder, cognate sets, data sparsity, metathesis, language embedding, pre-training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review