The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Semisupervised Neural Proto-Language Reconstruction
Open accessAbstract
Existing work implementing comparative reconstruction of ancestral languages (protolanguages) has usually required full supervision.However, historical reconstruction models are only of practical value if they can be trained with a limited amount of labeled data.We propose a semisupervised historical reconstruction task in which the model is trained on only a small amount of labeled data (cognate sets with proto-forms) and a large amount of unlabeled data (cognate sets without proto-forms).We propose a neural architecture for comparative reconstruction (DPD-BiReconstructor) incorporating an essential insight from linguists' comparative method: that reconstructed words should not only be reconstructable from their daughter words, but also deterministically transformable back into their daughter words.We show that this architecture is able to leverage unlabeled cognate sets to outperform strong semisupervised baselines on this novel task 1 .Vladimir I. Levenshtein.1966.Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals.In Soviet Physics Doklady, volume 10, pages 707-710.Soviet Union.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench
Nadgir, N., Kapoor, S., Liu, K., Kirgis, P., Orona, M., Rabanser, S., Bayer, T., Shetty, A., Ling, Y., Chan-Sew, D., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.26158
Reconstructing Proto-Languages Using Neural Machine Translation and Deep Learning
Sattorova, Z. I., Seydametova, G., Khujamberdieva, K., Ashirova, A. I., Jumaniyozov, Y., & Abdupattayevna, M. B. (2025) · International Conference on Computational Innovations and Engineering Sustainability (ICCIES) · doi:10.1109/iccies63851.2025.11032538
Using feature vectors for automated phonological reconstruction and reflex prediction
Wientzek, T. (2025) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.20647.1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, L., Xie, P., & Mortensen, D.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 14715-14759
- ISSN
- 0736-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402671328
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 11.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- historical linguistics, comparative reconstruction, semi-supervised learning, cognate sets, ancestral languages, unlabeled data, comparative analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review