Cited by 42FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How do Digitalization and the Fintech Phenomenon Affect Financial Decision-Making in the Younger Generation?

Open access

Abstract

Generation Z, who can handle almost everything online, from the picture taken by their mobile phone to purchasing or transferring money.Therefore, using several tech solutions, they are not looking for traditional banking solutions, like the ones where physical presence is needed.Their wish is to obtain secure, fast, easy financial solutions, and services.Additionally, to ensure payments can be easily made and investments are available on hand.All of this being virtually available any time when it is needed, even from their mobile phones and also providing a high-level of personalization possibilities.In our study, we surveyed risk attitudes governing individual investment decisions based on primary research conducted on a large sample size among university students.When surveying risk attitudes, we presented a group of university students studying in Hungary with questions of a test published in an international journal article by John Grable and Ruth H. Lytton (Grable -Lytton, 1999).Between early December 2020 and 15 January 2021, more than 2,000 students filled out our questionnaire.The results of the questionnaire show that risk attitude values among the group of Hungarian university students are in line with international experiences.Primary data collection will continue in the spring of 2021, and it will subsequently allow a comparison to be made between the attitudes to risk and investment of university students from different fields of study.The composition of the questionnaire's respondents will make it possible to survey and compare the 'Z' generation's attitude with that of other generations.É. Pintér et al. -192 - How do Digitalization and the Fintech Phenomenon Affect Financial Decision-Making in the YoungerGeneration?

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12700/aph.18.11.2021.11.11

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [11]11. SWIFT:ISO 20022. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2020
  2. [15]15. Gilliam, J., S.; Chatterjee, J. E.; Grable J.: Measuring the perception of financial risk tolerance: A tale of two measures. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 2017, Vol. 21 (2), pp. 30-43
  3. [16]16. Grable, J.; Lytton, R. H.: Financial risk tolerance revisited: The development of a risk assessment instrument. Financial Sendees Review, 1999, Nr. 8, pp. 163-181
  4. [17]17. Grable, J.; Hoo, S.: An Exploratory Framework of the Determinants of Financial Satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2004, Vol. 25(1), pp. 25-50
  5. [19]19. Kannadhasan, M.: Retail investor' financial risk tolerance and their risk- taking behaviour: the role of demographics as differentiating and classifying Factors. IIMB Management Review, 2015, 27: pp. 175-184
  6. [32]32. Nonis, Sarath A.: Thinking Patterns: An Exploratory Investigation of Student Perceptions of Costs and Benefits of College Loan Debt. Journal of Financial Education, Vol. 41, No. 2, Financial Education Association, 2015, pp. 24-48, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24573677

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Pintér, É., Bagó, P., Berényi, L., Molnár, L., Deutsch, N., Szigeti, G., & Pintér, T.
Affiliations
  • Corvinus University of Budapest (HU)
  • University of Miskolc (HU)
  • University of Pecs (HU)
  • Budapest University of Economics and Business (HU)
Venue
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica
Published
2021
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
191-208
ISSN
  • 1785-8860 (ISSN-L)
  • 2064-2687
OpenAlex
W4206440497
Cited by
42
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Polytechnica Hungarica (publishedVersion)
  • Corvinus Research Archive (Corvinus University of Budapest) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
Keywords
Generation Z, fintech, digitalization, financial decision-making, risk preferences, investment decision-making, university students, mobile payment, personal finance, Hungarian students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review