Cited by 1Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistory, Medicine, and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuro-politics: Will you vote with your cortex or limbic system?

Open access
Nasrallah, Henry A·2020·Current Psychiatry

Abstract

Neuro-politics: Will you vote with your cortex or limbic system?It's election season again.Every 4 years, October becomes the purgatory month of politics.But this year, it's even more complicated, being juxtaposed against a chaotic mosaic of a viral pandemic, economic travails, social upheaval, and exceptionally toxic political hyperpartisanship.The widespread expectation is that citizens will vote for their party's candidates, but there is now a body of evidence suggesting that our brains may be pre-wired to be liberal or conservative.Enter neuro-politics.This discipline is younger than neuro-economics, neuro-law, neuro-ethics, neuro-marketing, neuro-art, neuro-culture, or neuroesthetics.Neuro-politics focuses on the intersection of politics with neuroscience. 1 However, there are many antecedents to neuro-politics reflected in the writings of Plato, Aristotle, Niccolò Machiavelli, John Locke, Baruch Spinoza, Henri Bergson, William James, and others.Neuro-politics attempts to generate data to answer a variety of questions about political behavior, such as:• Is political orientation associated with differences in certain brain regions?

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12788/cp.0046

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Meeks TW, Jeste DV. Neurobiology of wisdom: a literature overview. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(4):355-365.
  2. Nasrallah HA. Does psychiatric practice make us wiser? Current Psychiatry. 2009;8(10):12,14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nasrallah, H. A.
Corresponding author
Nasrallah, Henry A
Venue
Current Psychiatry
Published
2020-10-01
Volume
19
Issue
10
OpenAlex
W3135408587
Cited by
1
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Current Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History, Medicine, and Leadership
Keywords
political orientation, hemispheric lateralization, political behavior, limbic system, prefrontal cortex, voting behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review