Cited by 7Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Early Warning Systems: The Neglected Importance of Timing

Open access
Rolnick, Joshua A·2019·Journal of Hospital Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12788/jhm.3229

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implementation gap has largely been filled by commercial electronic health record vendors, who integrated early warning systems into the EHR.

    “This gap has largely been filled by commercial electronic health record (EHR) vendors, who have integrated early warning systems into the EHR where they can be readily accessed by clinicians and linked to clinical interventions.12,13”

    From External validation of a widely implemented proprietary sepsis prediction model in hospitalized patients (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

    The opening section describes automated early warning systems and notifications to clinicians, but does not say that commercial EHR vendors filled an implementation gap. A reference title mentions an EHR-embedded sepsis alert; neither it nor the passages found by searching for vendor integration establish the claim about vendors. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. Crying wolf: the growing fatigue around sepsis alerts. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(3):161. doi: 10.1016/S2213- 2600(18)30072-9. · DOI
  2. Hooper MH, Weavind L, Wheeler AP, et al. Randomized trial of automat- ed, electronic monitoring to facilitate early detection of sepsis in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(7):2096-2101. doi: 10.1097/ CCM.0b013e318250a887. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Nelson JL, Smith BL, Jared JD, et al. Prospective trial of real-time electron- ic surveillance to expedite early care of severe sepsis. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(5):500-504. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.008. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Umscheid CA, Betesh J, VanZandbergen C, et al. Development, implemen- tation, and impact of an automated early warning and response system for sepsis. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(1):26-31. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2259. · DOI
  5. Kleinman KP, Abrams AM. Assessing surveillance using sensitivity, spec- ificity and timeliness. Stat Methods Med Res. 2006;15(5):445-464. doi: 10.1177/0962280206071641. · DOI
  6. Jiang X, Cooper GF, Neill DB. Generalized AMOC curves for evaluation and improvement of event surveillance. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009;281-285.
  7. Futoma J, Hariharan S, Sendak M, et al. An improved multi-output Gaussian process RNN with real-time validation for early sepsis detection. In Proceed- ings of the 2nd Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference (MLHC), Bos- ton, MA, Aug 2017.
  8. Rolnick J, Downing N, Shepard J, et al. Validation of test performance and clinical time zero for an electronic health record embedded severe sepsis alert. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7(2):560-572. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-11-RA-0159. · DOI
  9. DeVita MA, Smith GB, Adam SK, et al. "Identifying the hospitalised pa- tient in crisis"-A consensus conference on the afferent limb of rapid re- sponse systems. Resuscitation. 2010;81(4):375-382. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscita- tion.2009.12.008. · DOI
  10. Romero-Brufau S, Huddleston JM, Escobar GJ, et al. Why the C-statistic is not informative to evaluate early warning scores and what metrics to use. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):284-290. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0999-1. · DOI
  11. Evans IVR, Phillips GS, Alpern ER, et al. Association between the New York sepsis care mandate and in-hospital mortality for pediatric sepsis. JAMA. 2018;320(4):358-367. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9071. · DOI
  12. Daniels R, Nutbeam T, McNamara G, et al. The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(6):507-512. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.095067. · DOI
  13. Paul R, Melendez E, Wathen B, et al. A quality improvement collaborative for pediatric sepsis: lessons learned. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2018;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000051. · DOI
  14. Winter MC, Kubis S, Bonafide CP. Beyond reporting early warning score sensitivity: the temporal relationship and clinical relevance of "true positive" alerts that precede critical deterioration. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(3):138-143. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3066. · DOI
  15. Dummett BA, Adams C, Scruth E, et al. Incorporating an early detection sys- tem into routine clinical practice in two community hospitals: Incorporating an EWS into practice. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(51):S25-S31. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2661. · DOI
  16. Jolley RJ, Quan H, Jetté N, et al. Validation and optimisation of an ICD-10- coded case definition for sepsis using administrative health data. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009487. · DOI
  17. Wellner B, Grand J, Canzone E, et al. Predicting unplanned transfers to the intensive care unit: a machine learning approach leveraging diverse clinical elements. JMIR Med Inform. 2017;5(4):e45. doi: 10.2196/medinform.8680. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolnick, J. A.
Affiliations
Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rolnick, Joshua A
Venue
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
445
ISSN
  • 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-5606
OpenAlex
W2953710025
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
early warning systems, timing, clinical deterioration, clinical decision-making, patient safety
MeSH terms
Clinical Deterioration, Early Warning Score, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, Sepsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review