CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Social Media and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

La idea de comunidad digital y el uso político de las redes sociales en España

Open access
Lagares Díez, Nieves, Lagares Díez, Nieves, López-López, Paulo Carlos, Jaráiz Gulías, Erika·2021·Araucaria
DOI 10.12795/araucaria.2021.i48.11
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

El presente artículo analiza los usos políticos de las redes sociales en España y las funciones de las comunidades digitales que se generan a través de ellas. Para esto se han utilizado la Encuesta Social Europea del año 2018 para España, así como el Estudio Postelectoral Elecciones Generales de noviembre 2019 y el Barómetro Postelectoral del CIS de esa misma elección. Además, se analizan casi medio millón de tweets como respuesta a los mensajes emitidos en Twitter por los principales candidatos en los meses anteriores a las elecciones celebradas en abril. Como principales resultados, se constata un uso polarizado de las redes sociales para informarse y participar, así como la existencia de dos grupos dentro de las comunidades digitales que realizan el proceso de orientación o discusión. Igualmente, a medida que se acerca la fecha de las elecciones, las dinámicas de competición no se construyen en función de la lógica izquierda-derecha, sino en clave gobierno-oposición.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12795/araucaria.2021.i48.11

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Ahmed, S., Jaidka, K., & Cho, J. (2016). The 2014 Indian elections on Twitter: A comparison of campaign strategies of political parties. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 1071-1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.03.002 · DOI
  2. Andersson, E., & Olson, M. (2014). Political participation as public pedagogy- the educational situation in young people's political conversations in social media. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education.
  3. Anduiza, E., Cantijoch, M., Colombo, C., Gallego, A., & Salcedo, J. (2010). Los usos políticos de Internet en España. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (Reis), 129(1), 133-146.
  4. Arafa, M., & Armstrong, C. (2015). Facebook to Mobilize, Twitter to Coordinate Protests, and YouTube to Tell the World: New Media, Cyberactivism, and the Arab Spring. Journal of Global Initiatives, 10(1), 73-102.
  5. Baggiolini, L., & Rojas, S. C. (2017). Las redes de la política: Universo narrativo, campañas y microrrelato en Twitter. Inmediaciones de la Comunicación, 11(11), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2016.11.11.2621 · DOI
  6. Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A. & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological science, 26(10), 1531-1542 https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797615594620 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bimber, B. (2000). The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication, 17(4), 329-333.
  8. Brosius, H. B., Haim, M., & Weimann, G. (2019). Diffusion as a future perspective of agenda setting. The Agenda Setting Journal, 3(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.18022. · DOI
  9. Calvo, E., & Aruguete, N. (2018). # Tarifazo. Medios tradicionales y fusión de agenda en redes sociales. InMediaciones de la comunicaicón, 13(1), 189-213.
  10. Campos-Domínguez, E. (2017). Twitter y la comunicación política. El profesional de la información (EPI), 26(5), 785-793. https://doi. org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.01 · DOI
  11. Casero-Ripollés, A. (2015). Estrategias y prácticas comunicativas del activismo político en las redes sociales en España. Historia y comunicación social, 20(2), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2015.v20.n2.51399 · DOI
  12. Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Investigación sobre información política y redes sociales: puntos clave y retos de futuro. El profesional de la información, 27(5), 964-974. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1374201 · DOI
  13. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Dávila de León, C., & Jiménez García, G. (2014). Sentido de pertenencia y compromiso organizacional: predicción del bienestar. Revista de psicología (PUCP), 32(2), 271-302.
  15. Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, communication & society, 16(5), 757-774. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/1369118X.2013.782330 · DOI
  16. Farooq, G. (2017). Politics of Fake News: how WhatsApp became a potent propaganda tool in India. Media Watch, 9(1), 106-117. https://doi. org/10.15655/mw/2018/v9i1/49279 · DOI
  17. Fernández, C. B., & Rodríguez-Virgili, J. (2017). El consumo de información política de los públicos interesados comparado con el del electorado general. Los casos de las elecciones de Argentina, España y Venezuela de 2015. Revista de Comunicación, 16(2), 60-87. https://doi.org/10.26441/ RC16.2-2017-A3 · DOI
  18. Geiß, S. (2019). The Media's Conditional Agenda-Setting Power: How Baselines and Spikes of Issue Salience Affect Likelihood and Strength of Agenda-Setting. Communication Research, 0093650219874968. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0093650219874968 · DOI
  19. Gene Zucker, H. (1978). The variable nature of news media influence. Annals of the International Communication Association, 2(1), 225-240.
  20. Gerbaudo, P. (2017). From Cyber-Autonomism to Cyber-Populism: An Ideological Analysis of the Evolution of Digital Activism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 15(2), 477-489. https://doi. org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.773 · DOI
  21. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2019). WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism: exploring direct, indirect and generational effects. Information, Communication & Society, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642933 · DOI
  22. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of communication, 64(4), 612-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103 · DOI
  23. Goyanes, M., López-López, P. C., & Demeter, M. (2020). Social Media in Ecuador: Impact on Journalism Practice and Citizens' Understanding of Public Politics. Journalism Practice, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512 786.2020.1724180 · DOI
  24. Herbert, S. (2007). The "Battle of Seattle" revisited: Or, seven views of a protest-zoning state. Political Geography, 26(5), 601-619.
  25. Jacob, M. K. (2001). Hacia una redefinición del concepto de comunidad-cuatro ejes para un análisis crítico y una propuesta. Revista de psicología, 10(2), 49-60.
  26. Jaráiz, E., Lagares, N., Pereira, M (2020). Emociones y decisión de voto. Los componentes de voto en las elecciones generales de 2016 en España. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), 170, 115-136. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.170.115 · DOI
  27. Karlsen, R., & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3), 338-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645335 · DOI
  28. Lalancette, M., & Raynauld, V. (2019). The power of political image: Justin Trudeau, Instagram, and celebrity politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(7), 888-924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217744838 · DOI
  29. Lagares, N., & Cazorla, A. (2019). The Role of Emotions in the Resurgence of the Extreme Right in Spain: The Case of VOX in Andalusia. En ECPR General Conference, Wroclaw.
  30. López-López, P. C., & Oñate, P. (2019). De la videopolítica a la ciberpolítica: debate entre candidatos y televisiones en cinco elecciones presidenciales. El profesional de la información (EPI), 28(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/ epi.2019.sep.12 · DOI
  31. López-López, P. C., Oñate, P., & Rocha, Á. (2020). Social media mining, debate and feelings: digital public opinion's reaction in five presidential elections in Latin America. Cluster Computing, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10586-020-03072-8 · DOI
  32. Mahoney, J., Feltwell, T., Ajuruchi, O., & Lawson, S. (2016, May). Constructing the visual online political self: an analysis of Instagram Use by the Scottish Electorate. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3339-3351).
  33. McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H. (2013). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810880 · DOI
  34. Ocampo, A. X. (2018). The Politics of Inclusion: A Sense of Belonging to US Society and Latino Political Participation (Doctoral dissertation, UCLA).
  35. Oñate, P., & López-López, P.C. (2021). Información y participación en redes sociales y voto a Vox. In E. Jaráiz-Gulías, A. Cazorla-Martín & M. Pereira López (Coord.), El auge de la extrema derecha en España, (pp. 591-600).
  36. Tirant lo Blanch. Paiz Malespín, G. (2016). Tejiendo el consenso desde la combinación de las agendas: la Agenda Melding. Ciencia e Interculturalidad, 19(2), 104-121.
  37. Resende, G., Messias, J., Silva, M., Almeida, J., Vasconcelos, M., & Benevenuto, F. (2018, October). A system for monitoring public political groups in whatsapp. In Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (pp. 387-390).
  38. Rúas-Araújo, J. Mazaira-Castro, A (2019). Agenda mediática y política: ¿ Amistades peligrosas? Un análisis desde el fact-checking. In Debates electorales televisados: del antes al después (pp. 149-169). Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.
  39. Salwen, M. B. (1988). Effect of accumulation of coverage on issue salience in agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 65(1), 100-106.
  40. Schradie, J. (2015). Political Ideology, Social Media, and Labor Unions: Using the Internet to Reach the Powerful, Not Mobilize the Powerless. International Journal of Communication (19328036), 9.
  41. Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn't: how digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press.
  42. Shaw, D. L., McCombs, M., Weaver, D. H., & Hamm, B. J. (1999). Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ijpor/11.1.2 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19(1), 22-36.
  44. Soengas, X. (2013). El papel de Internet y de las redes sociales en las revueltas árabes: una alternativa a la censura de la prensa oficial. Comunicar, 21(41), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-14 · DOI
  45. La comunidad digital y el uso político de las redes sociales: elecciones generales del año 2019 en España Araucaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Filosofía, Política, Humanidades y Relaciones Internacionales, año 23, nº 48. Tercer cuatrimestre de 2021. Pp. 235-273. ISSN 1575-6823 e-ISSN 2340-2199 https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2021.i48. · DOI
  46. Vázquez, D. L., Rebollal, S. D., Vázquez, A. I. R., & García, X. L. (2016). El consumo millennial de información política en televisión y redes sociales. Análisis de la campaña Elecciones Generales en España 2015. Revista latina de comunicación social, (71), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.4185/ RLCS-2016-1139 · DOI
  47. Weaver, D., Wojdynski, B., McKeever, R., & Shaw, D. (2010, May). Vertical and or versus? Horizontal communities: Need for orientation, media use and agenda melding. In Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the World Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL. https://doi. org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3481.4881 · DOI
  48. Wolfson, T. (2014). Digital Rebellion: The Birth of the Cyber Left. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  49. Yamamoto, M., Kushin, M. J., & Dalisay, F. (2015). Social media and mobiles as political mobilization forces for young adults: Examining the moderating role of online political expression in political participation. New Media & Society, 17(6), 880-898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813518390 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lagares Díez, N., Lagares Díez, N., López-López, P. C., & Jaráiz Gulías, E.
Affiliations
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
ORCID
Venue
Araucaria
Publisher
Editorial Universidad de Sevilla
Published
2021
Issue
48
Pages
235-273
ISSN
  • 1575-6823 (ISSN-L)
  • 2340-2199
DOI
10.12795/araucaria.2021.i48.11
OpenAlex
W3217790745
Cited by
10
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Araucaria (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
online communities, 2019 Spanish general election, Twitter, political polarization, political participation, information seeking, political campaigns, left-right divide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review