Cited by 280Risk and Portfolio OptimizationAdvanced Optimization Algorithms ResearchAdvanced Control Systems Optimization

Robust and Data-Driven Optimization: Modern Decision Making Under Uncertainty

Bertsimas, Dimitris, Thiele, Aurélie·2006·Models, Methods, and Applications for Innovative Decision Making

Abstract

Traditional models of decision-making under uncertainty assume perfect information, i.e., ac-curate values for the system parameters and specific probability distributions for the random variables. However, such precise knowledge is rarely available in practice, and a strategy based on erroneous inputs might be infeasible or exhibit poor performance when implemented. The purpose of this tutorial is to present a mathematical framework that is well-suited to the limited information available in real-life problems and captures the decision-maker’s attitude towards uncertainty; the proposed approach builds upon recent developments in robust and data-driven optimization. In robust optimization, random variables are modeled as uncertain parameters be-longing to a convex uncertainty set and the decision-maker protects the system against the worst case within that set. Data-driven optimization uses observations of the random variables as direct inputs to the mathematical programming problems. The first part of the tutorial describes the robust optimization paradigm in detail in single-stage and multi-stage problems. In the second part, we address the issue of constructing uncertainty sets using historical realizations of the random variables and investigate the connection between convex sets, in particular polyhedra, and a specific class of risk measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/educ.1063.0022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Robust optimization is a two-stage optimization problem where the inner level minimizes the objective function and the outer level maximizes the inner-optimization within an uncertainty set.

    “Robust optimization is a two-stage optimization problem where the inner level minimizes the objective function and the outer level maximizes the inner-optimization within an uncertainty set [22]-[24], [29].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertsimas, D., & Thiele, A.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
Venue
Models, Methods, and Applications for Innovative Decision Making
Publisher
INFORMS
Published
2006-09
Pages
95-122
OpenAlex
W2170344528
Cited by
280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.42
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Keywords
robust optimization, data-driven optimization, decision making under uncertainty, optimization under uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review