Robust and Data-Driven Optimization: Modern Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Abstract
Traditional models of decision-making under uncertainty assume perfect information, i.e., ac-curate values for the system parameters and specific probability distributions for the random variables. However, such precise knowledge is rarely available in practice, and a strategy based on erroneous inputs might be infeasible or exhibit poor performance when implemented. The purpose of this tutorial is to present a mathematical framework that is well-suited to the limited information available in real-life problems and captures the decision-maker’s attitude towards uncertainty; the proposed approach builds upon recent developments in robust and data-driven optimization. In robust optimization, random variables are modeled as uncertain parameters be-longing to a convex uncertainty set and the decision-maker protects the system against the worst case within that set. Data-driven optimization uses observations of the random variables as direct inputs to the mathematical programming problems. The first part of the tutorial describes the robust optimization paradigm in detail in single-stage and multi-stage problems. In the second part, we address the issue of constructing uncertainty sets using historical realizations of the random variables and investigate the connection between convex sets, in particular polyhedra, and a specific class of risk measures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Robust optimization is a two-stage optimization problem where the inner level minimizes the objective function and the outer level maximizes the inner-optimization within an uncertainty set.
“Robust optimization is a two-stage optimization problem where the inner level minimizes the objective function and the outer level maximizes the inner-optimization within an uncertainty set [22]-[24], [29].”
From Chance constrained day-ahead robust flexibility needs assessment for low voltage distribution network (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robust earth observation satellite scheduling with uncertainty of cloud coverage
Wang, X., Song, G., Leus, R., & Han, C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2019.2947978 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Hashmi, M. U., Koirala, A., Ergun, H., & Van Hertem, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.10234 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bertsimas, D., & Thiele, A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Lehigh University (US)
- Venue
- Models, Methods, and Applications for Innovative Decision Making
- Publisher
- INFORMS
- Published
- 2006-09
- Pages
- 95-122
- OpenAlex
- W2170344528
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- robust optimization, data-driven optimization, decision making under uncertainty, optimization under uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review