The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network
Abstract
Alignment of information systems (IS) strategy with business strategy is a top concern of both the chief information officer (CIO) and the top management team (TMT) of organizations. Even though researchers and key decision makers in organizations recognize the importance of IS strategic alignment, they often struggle to understand how this alignment is created. In this paper, we develop a nomological network in which shared understanding between the CIO and TMT about the role of IS in the organization (which represents the social dimension of IS strategic alignment) is posited to be a proximal antecedent of the intellectual dimension of IS strategic alignment. We further posit that shared language, shared domain knowledge manifest in the CIO's business knowledge and the TMT's strategic IS knowledge, systems of knowing (structural and social), and CIO-TMT experiential similarity are important determinants of this shared understanding. Data were collected from 243 matched CIO-TMT pairs. Results largely support the proposed nomological network. Specifically, shared understanding between the CIO and TMT is a significant antecedent of IS strategic alignment. Furthermore, shared language, shared domain knowledge, and structural systems of knowing influence the development of shared understanding between the CIO and the TMT. Contrary to expectations and to findings of prior research, social systems of knowing, representing informal social interactions between the CIO and TMT, and experiential similarity did not have a significant effect on shared understanding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250961 · Cited by 10,176
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376806 · Cited by 5,807
Cited by
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23044052 · Cited by 1,187
How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management
Chen, D. Q., Preston, D. S., & Swink, M. (2015) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1138364 · Cited by 829
Self-citationPapadopoulos, T., Baltas, K. N., & Balta, M. E. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102192 · Cited by 678
Wu, S. P.-J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T.-P. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.2.10 · Cited by 566
Product fit uncertainty in online markets: nature, effects, and antecedents
Hong, Y. (., & Pavlou, P. A. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2014.0520 · Cited by 453
Metadata
- Authors
- Preston, D. S., & Karahanna, E.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-179
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2002814464
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 21.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.1070.0159
- The paper
- Preston, D. S., & Karahanna, E. (2009). Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.