The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Performance Impacts of Quick Response and Strategic Alignment in Specialty Retailing
Abstract
The Quick Response (QR) program is a hierarchical suite of information technologies (IT) and applications designed to improve the performance of retailers. Consultants advise retailers to adopt the program wholesale, implying that more and higher levels of technology are better than less technology and lower levels. Academicians, on the other hand, argue that good technology is “appropriate” technology. That is firms should adopt only those technologies that suit the specific strategic directions pursued by the firm. Who is right? Which approach to investing in IT yields better performance results? Surprisingly, this cross-sectional survey of 80 specialty retailers found more support for the practitioners' claims than for the academicians'. Adoption of the QR program at a minimal level was associated with higher performance, although there was no performance impact due to higher levels of QR use. Firms did appear to match their IT usage to their business strategies, but there was no linkage between strategic alignment and firm performance, and there was surprisingly little variation in business or IT strategy. In short, the findings of our study suggest that both practitioners and academicians need to refine their theories and advice about what makes IT investments pay off.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Cited by
RAVICHANDRAN, T., LERTWONGSATIEN, C., & LERTWONGSATIEN, C. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820 · Cited by 1,238
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23044052 · Cited by 1,187
Looking Toward the Future of IT–Business Strategic Alignment Through the Past: A Meta-Analysis1
Gerow, J. E., Grover, V., Thatcher, J., & Roth, P. L. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.10 · Cited by 277
Information Technology Impacts on Firm Performance: An Extension of Kohli and 1
Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.4.4 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, J. W., & Markus, M. L.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-259
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2059442208
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.