Cited by 121Open Source Software InnovationsSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesKnowledge Management and Sharing

Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source software project

Lindberg, Aron, Berente, Nicholas, Gaskin, James, Lyytinen, Kalle·2016·Information Systems Research

Abstract

To manage work interdependencies, online communities draw on a variety of arm’s length coordination mechanisms offered by information technology platforms and associated practices. However, “unresolved interdependencies” remain that cannot be addressed by such arm’s length mechanisms. These interdependencies reflect, for example, unidentified or emerging knowledge-based dependencies between the community members or unaccounted relationships between ongoing community tasks. At the same time, online communities cannot resort to hierarchical coordination mechanisms such as incentives or command structures to address such interdependencies. So, how do they manage such interdependencies? To address this question, we conduct an exploratory, theory-generating case study involving qualitative and computational analyses of development activities within an open source software community: Rubinius. We analyze the ongoing management of interdependencies within the community and find that unresolved interdependencies are associated with alternatively structured sequences of activities, which we define as routines. In particular, we observe that two distinct classes of interdependencies—development and developer interdependencies—are associated with alternative forms of routine variation. We identify two generalized routine components—direct implementation and knowledge integration, which address these two distinct classes of unresolved interdependencies. In particular, direct implementati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.2016.0673

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Gaskin, J., & Lyytinen, K.
Affiliations
  • Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2016-12
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
751-772
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2558596793
Cited by
121
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
online communities, interdependence, coordination mechanisms, open source software, routines, knowledge integration, organizational routines, knowledge-based view

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review