Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source software project
Abstract
To manage work interdependencies, online communities draw on a variety of arm’s length coordination mechanisms offered by information technology platforms and associated practices. However, “unresolved interdependencies” remain that cannot be addressed by such arm’s length mechanisms. These interdependencies reflect, for example, unidentified or emerging knowledge-based dependencies between the community members or unaccounted relationships between ongoing community tasks. At the same time, online communities cannot resort to hierarchical coordination mechanisms such as incentives or command structures to address such interdependencies. So, how do they manage such interdependencies? To address this question, we conduct an exploratory, theory-generating case study involving qualitative and computational analyses of development activities within an open source software community: Rubinius. We analyze the ongoing management of interdependencies within the community and find that unresolved interdependencies are associated with alternatively structured sequences of activities, which we define as routines. In particular, we observe that two distinct classes of interdependencies—development and developer interdependencies—are associated with alternative forms of routine variation. We identify two generalized routine components—direct implementation and knowledge integration, which address these two distinct classes of unresolved interdependencies. In particular, direct implementati…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
OSS development relies on the voluntary participation of geographically dispersed developers without formal hierarchies or standardized workflows.
“OSS development relies on the voluntary participation of geographically dispersed developers without formal hierarchies or standardized workflows (Levine and Prietula 2014, Lindberg et al. 2016).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Collaborative Open-Source Software Development: Evidence from GitHub Copilot  (2024) · cites this paper as Lindberg et al. 2016
Coordination is often informal and decentralized in OSS settings, shaped by fluid team composition and voluntary participation.
“coordination is often informal and decentralized in OSS settings, shaped by fluid team composition and voluntary participation (Howison and Crowston 2014, Lindberg et al. 2016).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Collaborative Open-Source Software Development: Evidence from GitHub Copilot  (2024) · cites this paper as Lindberg et al. 2016
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, J. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203771587 · Cited by 25,373 · see citing works
A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors
O’brien, R. M. (2007) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 · Cited by 11,217 · see citing works
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801 · see citing works
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504 · see citing works
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451 · see citing works
Task complexity: Definition of the construct
Wood, R. E. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0 · Cited by 1,393 · see citing works
Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.10 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Tang, S., & Han, N. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063211045023 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Platform Synergy: Architectural Origins and Competitive Consequences
Tiwana, A. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2017.0739 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Maruping, L. M., Daniel, S. L., & Cataldo, M. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13928 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Song, F., Agarwal, A., & Wen, W. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal (preprint) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4856935 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“We refer to these efforts related to code integration, communication, planning, and resolving conflicts stemming from task interdependencies as integration costs (Howison and Crowston 2014, Lindberg et al. 2016, Medappa and Srivastava 2019, Shaikh and Vaast 2023).”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Gaskin, J., & Lyytinen, K.
- Affiliations
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 751-772
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2558596793
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- online communities, interdependence, coordination mechanisms, open source software, routines, knowledge integration, organizational routines, knowledge-based view
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review