Cited by 23Information Systems Theories and ImplementationBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

Following the MAP (Methods, Approaches, Perspectives) in Information Systems Research

Levallet, Nadège, Denford, James S., Chan, Yolande E.·2021·Information Systems Research

Abstract

Following the Methods, Approaches, Perspectives (MAP) in IS Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.2020.0964

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levallet, N., Denford, J. S., & Chan, Y. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Royal Military College of Canada (CA)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
130-146
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W3115441022
Cited by
23
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
research methodology, research approaches, future research directions, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review