Workflow Automation in Open-Source Software Development: Accelerating Innovation Through Mechanization and Orchestration
Open accessAbstract
This study develops a conceptual framework distinguishing two mechanisms of workflow automation: mechanization and orchestration. Mechanization automates discrete, self-contained, repeatable tasks through standardized execution to enhance consistency, reliability, and efficiency, while orchestration automates the communication between tasks, workers, and stages, which facilitates information flow and coordination. We theorize that these mechanisms differentially affect incremental versus substantive innovation. Using a multimethod approach integrating machine learning and econometrics, we analyze the effects of workflow automation in open-source software development, demonstrating that mechanization accelerates maintenance-oriented exploitative innovation, whereas orchestration accelerates development-oriented explorative innovation. This mechanization-orchestration distinction extends beyond software contexts. For practitioners, aligning automation strategies with innovation goals is essential: deploy mechanization to enhance operational efficiency and support incremental improvements in stable environments; and implement orchestration to enable adaptive coordination in exploratory, high-velocity development requiring creativity and flexibility. For policymakers, understanding this distinction informs workforce development and technology adoption policies, as automation reshapes work by shifting human contribution from routine execution toward coordinated problem solving and strategic decision making.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Monthly increase of stars and forks captures downstream effects on community recognition and developer interest.
“Fourth, we examine the monthly increase of stars and forks to capture downstream effects on community recognition and developer interest (Huang et al. 2026).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Collaborative Open-Source Software Development: Evidence from GitHub Copilot  (2024) · cites this paper as Huang et al. 2026
Cites
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755 · see citing works
Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content
Doshi, A., & Hauser, O. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4535536 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Matrix Completion Methods for Causal Panel Data Models
Athey, S., Bayati, M., Doudchenko, N., Imbens, G., & Khosravi, K. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w25132 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Liu, L., Wang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2024) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12723 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Open source software development—Just another case of collective invention?
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.004 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Large Language Model in Creative Work: The Role of Collaboration Modality and User Expertise
Chen, Z., & Chan, J. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.03014 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Hann, I.-H., Roberts, J. A., & Slaughter, S. A. (2013) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0474 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Cui, Z., Demirer, M., Jaffe, S., Musolff, L., Peng, S., & Salz, T. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4945566 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Song, F., Agarwal, A., & Wen, W. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal (preprint) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4856935 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Song, F., Agarwal, A., & Wen, W. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal (preprint) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4856935 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huang, A., Huang, N., & Hong, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Ni
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2026-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1643-1662
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W7122787564
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- workflow automation, mechanization, orchestration, open source software development, incremental innovation, substantive innovation, exploitative innovation, exploratory innovation, software maintenance, task coordination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review