The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reengineering the Dutch Flower Auctions: A Framework for Analyzing Exchange Organizations
Abstract
This paper specifies a generalizable model of exchange processes and develops a process-stakeholder analysis framework to evaluate alternative market designs. This framework is applied to analyze a number of information technology initiatives in the Dutch flower markets. The Dutch flower auctions are the world's leading centers for trading cut flowers and potted plants. We undertake a cross-case analysis and apply our framework to analyse successes and failures in the introduction of new IT-based trading mechanisms in these markets. Based on our study, we develop a number of testable propositions on: the separation of physical and informational processes in trading, the responses of stakeholders to changes in available information due to IT initiatives, and economic and incentive conditions required for adoption of new trading processes. Finally, our detailed cases illustrate the institutional and incentive constraints, and complexities encountered in the introduction of new electronic markets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451
The impact of information systems on organizations and markets
Gurbaxani, V., & Whang, S. (1991) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/99977.99990 · Cited by 960
Cited by
Economics and Electronic Commerce: Survey and Directions for Research
Kauffman, R. J., & Walden, E. A. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044222 · Cited by 386
Cloud Migration: A Case Study of Migrating an Enterprise IT System to IaaS
Khajeh-Hosseini, A., Greenwood, D., & Sommerville, I. (2010) · 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/cloud.2010.37 · Cited by 355
Research Commentary: Transformational Issues in Researching IS and Net-Enabled Organizations
Straub, D. W., & Watson, R. T. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.4.337.9706 · Cited by 280
Perceived risk and trust associated with purchasing at electronic marketplaces
Verhagen, T., Meents, S., & Tan, Y.-H. (2006) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000644 · Cited by 270
Gengatharen, D. E., & Standing, C. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000551 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Kambil, A., & van Heck, E.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2127453862
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reengineering the Dutch Flower Auctions: A Framework for Analyzing Exchange Organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.9.1.1
- The paper
- Kambil, A., & van Heck, E. (1998). Reengineering the Dutch Flower Auctions: A Framework for Analyzing Exchange Organizations. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
