The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promotional Chat on the Internet
Open accessAbstract
Chat rooms, recommendation sites, and customer review sections allow consumers to overcome geographic boundaries and to communicate based on mutual interests. However, marketers also have incentives to supply promotional chat or reviews in order to influence the consumers’ evaluation of their products. Moreover, firms can disguise their promotion as consumer recommendations due to the anonymity afforded by online communities. We explore this new setting where advertising and word of mouth become perfect substitutes because they appear indistinguishable to the consumer. Specifically, we investigate here whether word of mouth remains credible and whether firms choose to devote more resources promoting their inferior or superior products. We develop a game theoretic model in which two products are differentiated in their value to the consumer. Unlike the firms, the consumers are uncertain about the products’ quality. The consumers read messages online that help them decide on the identity of the superior product. We find a unique equilibrium where online word of mouth is persuasive despite the promotional chat activity by competing firms. In this equilibrium, firms spend more resources promoting inferior products, in striking contrast to existing advertising literature. In addition, we discuss consumer welfare implications and how other marketing strategies might interact with promotional chat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses
Fitzsimons, G. J., & Lehmann, D. R. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1030.0033 · Cited by 604
Cited by
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Self-citationSocial media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix
Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002 · Cited by 4,111
Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0071 · Cited by 2,601
Self-citationPromotional Reviews: An Empirical Investigation of Online Review Manipulation
Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.8.2421 · Cited by 937
Self-citationFirm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2009) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1080.0444 · Cited by 837
Self-citationAral, S., & Walker, D. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1421 · Cited by 786
Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., & Mitra, S. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55 · Cited by 760
Impact of online WOM on destination trust and intention to travel: A medical tourism perspective
Abubakar, A. M., & Ilkan, M. (2016) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2015.12.005 · Cited by 482
Bapna, R., & Umyarov, A. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2081 · Cited by 350
Thumbs Up, Sales Up? The Contingent Effect of Facebook Likes on Sales Performance in Social Commerce
Lee, K., Lee, B., & Oh, W. (2015) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1138372 · Cited by 181
Designing reputation mechanisms
Dellarocas, C., Dini, F., & Spagnolo, G. (2006) · Handbook of Procurement · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511492556.019 · Cited by 44
Morvinski, C., Amir, O., & Muller, E. (2017) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2016.1011 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayzlin, D.
- Venue
- Marketing Science
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-163
- ISSN
- 0732-2399 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2161783275
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 87.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.