The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing
Abstract
The importance of remanufacturing used products into new ones has been widely recognized in the literature and in practice. In this paper, we address the problem of choosing the appropriate reverse channel structure for the collection of used products from customers. Specifically, we consider a manufacturer who has three options for collecting such products: (1) she can collect them herself directly from the customers, (2) she can provide suitable incentives to an existing retailer (who already has a distribution channel) to induce the collection, or (3) she can subcontract the collection activity to a third party. Based on our observations in the industry, we model the three options described above as decentralized decision-making systems with the manufacturer being the Stackelberg leader. When considering decentralized channels, we find that ceteris paribus, the agent, who is closer to the customer (i.e., the retailer), is the most effective undertaker of product collection activity for the manufacturer. In addition, we show that simple coordination mechanisms can be designed such that the collection effort of the retailer and the supply chain profits are attained at the same level as in a centrally coordinated system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review
Srivastava, S. K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · Cited by 3,984
Zhang, A., Wang, J. X., Farooque, M., Wang, Y., & Choi, T.-M. (2021) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102509 · Cited by 224
Examining the role of procurement 4.0 towards remanufacturing operations and circular economy
Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Gupta, S., & Sivarajah, U. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1817602 · Cited by 94
Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire
Hansen, E. G., & Revellio, F. (2020) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13016 · Cited by 92
Biodiesel produced by waste cooking oil: Review of recycling modes in China, the US and Japan
Zhang, H., Aytun Ozturk, U., Wang, Q., & Zhao, Z. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.042 · Cited by 85
Liu, C.-Y., Wang, H., Tang, J., Chang, C.-T., & Liu, Z. (2021) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102516 · Cited by 83
Adaptive remanufacturing for multiple lifecycles: A case study in office furniture
Krystofik, M., Luccitti, A., Parnell, K., & Thurston, M. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.028 · Cited by 74
Sustainable Furniture that Grows with End-Users
Bosch, T., Verploegen, K., Grösser, S. N., & van Rhijn, G. (2017) · Dynamics of Long-Life Assets · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45438-2_16 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-252
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2111107475
- Cited by
- 2,227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 71.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.