The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamic Conversion Behavior at E-Commerce Sites
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops a model of conversion behavior (i.e., converting store visits into purchases) that predicts each customer's probability of purchasing based on an observed history of visits and purchases. We offer an individual-level probability model that allows for different forms of customer heterogeneity in a very flexible manner. Specifically, we decompose an individual's conversion behavior into two components: one for accumulating visit effects and another for purchasing threshold effects. Each component is allowed to vary across households as well as over time. Visit effects capture the notion that store visits can play different roles in the purchasing process. For example, some visits are motivated by planned purchases, while others are associated with hedonic browsing (akin to window shopping); our model is able to accommodate these (and several other) types of visit-purchase relationships in a logical, parsimonious manner. The purchasing threshold captures the psychological resistance to online purchasing that may grow or shrink as a customer gains more experience with the purchasing process at a given website. We test different versions of the model that vary in the complexity of these two key components and also compare our general framework with popular alternatives such as logistic regression. We find that the proposed model offers excellent statistical properties, including its performance in a holdout validation sample, and also provides useful managerial diagnostics about the patterns underlying online buyer behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Digital marketing: a framework, review, and research agenda
Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. “. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006 · Cited by 1,707
Huang, P., Lurie, N. H., & Mitra, S. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55 · Cited by 760
(2007) · Cited by 737
Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts
Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F., & Trossen, D. R. (2014) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/674424 · Cited by 436
Venkatesh, V., & Agarwal, R. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0442 · Cited by 285
Modeling consumer purchasing behavior in social shopping communities with clickstream data
Olbrich, R., & Holsing, C. (2011) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415160202 · Cited by 277
Prospects for Personalization on the Internet
Montgomery, A. L., & Smith, M. D. (2009) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2009.02.001 · Cited by 264
Crumbs of the Cookie: User Profiling in Customer-Base Analysis and Behavioral Targeting
Trusov, M., Ma, L., & Jamal, Z. (2016) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2015.0956 · Cited by 165
Online Product Reviews-Triggered Dynamic Pricing: Theory and Evidence
Feng, J., Li, X., & Zhang, X. (. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0852 · Cited by 117
Learning to recommend with multiple cascading behaviors
Gao, C., He, X., Gan, D., Chen, X., Feng, F., Li, Y., Chua, T.-S., Yao, L., Song, Y., & Jin, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2019.2958808 · Cited by 136
Luo, X., Lu, X., & Li, J. (2019) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0859 · Cited by 87
Last‐mile supply chain efficiency: an analysis of learning curves in online ordering
Kull, T. J., Boyer, K., & Calantone, R. (2007) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570710736985 · Cited by 71
The effect of free sampling strategies on freemium conversion rates
Koch, O. F., & Benlian, A. (2017) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-016-0236-z · Cited by 67
Predicting online shopping cart abandonment with machine learning approaches
Rausch, T. M., Derra, N. D., & Wolf, L. (2022) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/1470785320972526 · Cited by 36
Reimer, K., & Becker, J. U. (2015) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-014-0110-z · Cited by 11
Freemium Pricing: Evidence from a Large-scale Field Experiment
Runge, J., Wagner, S., & Claussen, J. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2888471 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Moe, W. W., & Fader, P. S.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-335
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2151987718
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.