The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; its reference list is not available.
Predicting online shopping cart abandonment with machine learning approaches
Abstract
Excessive online shopping cart abandonment rates constitute a major challenge for e-commerce companies and can inhibit their success within their competitive environment. Simultaneously, the emergence of the Internet’s commercial usage results in steadily growing volumes of data about consumers’ online behavior. Thus, data-driven methods are needed to extract valuable knowledge from such big data to automatically identify online shopping cart abandoners. Hence, this contribution analyzes clickstream data of a leading German online retailer comprising 821,048 observations to predict such abandoners by proposing different machine learning approaches. Thereby, we provide methodological insights to gather a comprehensive understanding of the practicability of classification methods in the context of online shopping cart abandonment prediction: our findings indicate that gradient boosting with regularization outperforms the remaining models yielding an F 1 -Score of 0.8569 and an AUC value of 0.8182. Nevertheless, as gradient boosting tends to be computationally infeasible, a decision tree or boosted logistic regression may be suitable alternatives, balancing the trade-off between model complexity and prediction accuracy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“they resort to ESCA to avoid accepting cookies and pop-up options on websites”
From Electronic shopping cart abandonment: What do we know and where should we be heading? (2024) · cites this paper as Rausch et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Customers feel captivated due to such online surveillance and increasing cybercrime”
From Electronic shopping cart abandonment: What do we know and where should we be heading? (2024) · cites this paper as Rausch et al., 2020
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 74 · Cited by 36
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- 10.1145/1299015.1299021 · DOI
- 10.1561/9781601982957 · DOI
- Bogina V., 2019, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34
- 10.1109/IKT.2014.7030334 · DOI
- 10.1145/130385.130401 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00058655 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
- Breiman L., 1984, Classification and regression trees
- 10.1509/jmkr.40.3.249.19241 · DOI
- 10.1145/1143844.1143865 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mksc.22.4.520.24906 · DOI
- 10.2307/41703503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00108-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473750 · DOI
- Chollet F., 2018, Deep learning with R
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0514 · DOI
- 10.1145/1143844.1143874 · DOI · Paper page
- Deng L., 2011, Proceedings of Asian-Pacific Signal & Information Processing Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA-ASC), 1
- Dietterich T. G., 2002, The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 110
- Doshi-Velez F., 2017, arXiv, 1702, 08608
- Duda R. O., 1973, Pattern classification and scene analysis
- 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Fayyad U., 1996, AI Magazine, 17, 37
- 10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/aos/1013203451 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/aos/1016218223 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3236009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10994-009-5119-5 · DOI
- 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/2.485891 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.17705/1jais.00477 · DOI
- Kohavi R., 1995, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2, 1137
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-1627-9_1 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2696365 · DOI · Paper page
- Liaw A., 2002, R News, 2, 18
- 10.1057/ejis.2013.10 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15327663JCP13-1&2_03 · DOI
- 10.1002/dir.10074 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0153 · DOI
- 10.1287/inte.31.2.90.10630 · DOI
- 10.1287/mksc.1040.0073 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dss.2014.03.001 · DOI
- 10.21917/ijsc.2015.0133 · DOI
- 10.1613/jair.614 · DOI · Paper page
- Provost F., 1997, Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 43
- 10.1023/A:1007601015854 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.01.006 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10462-009-9124-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00521-018-3523-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1147/rd.33.0210 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/aos/1024691352 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1509/jmkr.41.3.306.35985 · DOI
- Srivastava N., 2014, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 1929
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1018628609742 · DOI
- 10.1214/08-AOAS224 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.simpat.2015.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.022 · DOI
- Vapnik V. N., 1982, Estimation of dependences based on empirical data
- 10.1145/1163593.1163596 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-2070(97)00044-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/aos/1176349027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.inffus.2017.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICCE.2018.8326351 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Rausch, T. M., Derra, N. D., & Wolf, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Bayreuth (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Derra, Nicholas Daniel
- Venue
- International Journal of Market Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-11-19
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-112
- ISSN
- 1470-7853 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-2173
- OpenAlex
- W3102359981
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Market Research (publishedVersion)
- ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
- Keywords
- e-commerce, clickstream data, gradient boosting, decision tree, model complexity, prediction accuracy, big data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting online shopping cart abandonment with machine learning approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1470785320972526
- The paper
- Rausch, T. M., Derra, N. D., & Wolf, L. (2022). Predicting online shopping cart abandonment with machine learning approaches. International Journal of Market Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320972526