Cited by 840Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Up Close and Personal: Investor Sophistication and the Disposition Effect

Dhar, Ravi, Zhu, Ning·2006·Management Science

Abstract

This paper analyzes the trading records of a major discount brokerage house to investigate the disposition effect, the tendency to sell stocks that have appreciated in price (winners) sooner than stocks that trade below the purchase price (losers). In contrast to previous research that has demonstrated the disposition effect by aggregating across investors, our main objective is to identify differences in the disposition bias across individuals and explain this in terms of underlying investor characteristics. Building on the findings in experimental economics and social psychology, we hypothesize that differences in investor literacy about financial markets and trading frequency are responsible in part for the variation in individual disposition effect. Using demographic and socioeconomic variables as proxies for investor literacy, we find empirical evidence that wealthier individuals and individuals employed in professional occupations exhibit a lower disposition effect. Consistent with experimental economics, trading frequency also tends to reduce the disposition effect. We provide guidelines for investment advisors, regulators, and investment communities to utilize our findings and help investors make better decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0473

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Persistent evidence of irrationality has been identified, such as overreaction and the disposition effect.

    “However, persistent evidence of irrationality has been identified, such as overreaction (Bondt & Thaler, 1985) and the disposition effect (Dhar & Zhu, 2006; Grinblatt & Keloharju, 2001; Shefrin & Statman, 1985).”
  • Proxies for financial sophistication used in the literature include income and wealth, age, educational attainment, professional status, and IQ.

    “Corresponding proxies for financial sophistication used in the literature include (disposable) income and wealth (Dhar and Zhu 2006;Vissing-Jorgensen 2003;Calvet et al. 2007Calvet et al. , 2009) ) as well as age (Calvet et al. 2007(Calvet et al. , 2009;;Georgarakos and Pasini 2011), educational attainment (Christiansen et al. 2008;Calvet et al. 2007Calvet et al. , 2009)), professional status (Calv”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Dhar and Zhu 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhar, R., & Zhu, N.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Management Science
Published
2006-05
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
726-740
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
OpenAlex
W2125884277
Cited by
840
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 48
FWCI
42.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Management Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
disposition effect, investor sophistication, trading frequency, wealth, professions, investor behavior, investment advisers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review