The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A General, Analytic Method for Generating Robust Strategies and Narrative Scenarios
Abstract
Robustness is a key criterion for evaluating alternative decisions under conditions of deep uncertainty. However, no systematic, general approach exists for finding robust strategies using the broad range of models and data often available to decision makers. This study demonstrates robust decision making (RDM), an analytic method that helps design robust strategies through an iterative process that first suggests candidate robust strategies, identifies clusters of future states of the world to which they are vulnerable, and then evaluates the trade-offs in hedging against these vulnerabilities. This approach can help decision makers design robust strategies while also systematically generating clusters of key futures interpretable as narrative scenarios. Our study demonstrates the approach by identifying robust, adaptive, near-term pollution-control strategies to help ensure economic growth and environmental quality throughout the 21st century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & ter Maat, J. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006 · Cited by 1,745
The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review
Klibi, W., Martel, A., & Guitouni, A. (2010) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.011 · Cited by 870
Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change
Polasky, S., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., & Keeler, B. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007 · Cited by 560
Kriegler, E., O’Neill, B. C., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Lempert, R. J., Moss, R. H., & Wilbanks, T. (2012) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.005 · Cited by 548
Self-citationMany objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change
Kasprzyk, J. R., Nataraj, S., Reed, P. M., & Lempert, R. J. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.12.007 · Cited by 508
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lempert, R. J., Groves, D. G., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 514-528
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2166390850
- Cited by
- 805
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A General, Analytic Method for Generating Robust Strategies and Narrative Scenarios. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0472
- The paper
- Lempert, R. J., Groves, D. G., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C. (2006). A General, Analytic Method for Generating Robust Strategies and Narrative Scenarios. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.