Cited by 548Climate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate variability and models

The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways

Kriegler, Elmar, O’Neill, Brian C., Hallegatte, Stephane, Kram, Tom, Lempert, Robert J., Moss, Richard H., Wilbanks, Thomas·2012·Global Environmental Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having common climate and socioeconomic scenarios serves as a critical means to enhance direct comparability of a wide variety of studies, allowing synthetic conclusions to be drawn that would not be possible from a variety of uncoordinated studies.

    “Having common climate and socioeconomic scenarios serves as a critical means to enhance direct comparability of a wide variety of studies, allowing synthetic conclusions to be drawn that would not be possible from a variety of uncoordinated studies (van Vuuren et al., 2012;Kriegler et al., 2012).”

    From The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 (2016) · cites this paper as Kriegler et al., 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kriegler, E., O’Neill, B. C., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Lempert, R. J., Moss, R. H., & Wilbanks, T.
Affiliations
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Joint Global Change Research Institute (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Kriegler, Elmar
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
807-822
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969073155
Cited by
548
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 4
FWCI
87.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
socio-economic scenarios, Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, climate change, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, climate policy, integrated assessment models, radiative forcing, temperature projections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review