The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry
Abstract
The paper analyzes the strategies of software firms that have entered the open source (OS) field. The notion of the OS business model is discussed in the light of a substantial body of theoretical literature concerning strategic management and the economics of innovation, as well as specialized literature on OS. Empirical evidence based on a survey of 146 Italian software firms shows that firms have adapted to an environment dominated by incumbent standards by combining the offering of proprietary and OS software under different licensing schemes, thus choosing a hybrid business model. The paper examines the determinants of the degree of openness toward OS and discusses the stability of hybrid models in the evolution of the industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.443040 · Cited by 1,531
The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1997) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.10.1345 · Cited by 811
GRIFFITHS, P., GOSSOP, M., POWIS, B., & STRANG, J. (1993) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02036.x · Cited by 290
Cited by
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.30744031 · Cited by 1,218
Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development1
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703471 · Cited by 698
von Krogh, G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Haefliger, S. (2012) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.001 · Cited by 300
Open source software development—Just another case of collective invention?
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.10.004 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S., & Rossi, C.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1085-1098
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3125469391
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 45.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0547
- The paper
- Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S., & Rossi, C. (2006). Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
