The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment
Open accessAbstract
By decision-making in a fuzzy environment is meant a decision process in which the goals and/or the constraints, but not necessarily the system under control, are fuzzy in nature. This means that the goals and/or the constraints constitute classes of alternatives whose boundaries are not sharply defined. An example of a fuzzy constraint is: “The cost of A should not be substantially higher than α,” where α is a specified constant. Similarly, an example of a fuzzy goal is: “x should be in the vicinity of x 0 ,” where x 0 is a constant. The italicized words are the sources of fuzziness in these examples. Fuzzy goals and fuzzy constraints can be defined precisely as fuzzy sets in the space of alternatives. A fuzzy decision, then, may be viewed as an intersection of the given goals and constraints. A maximizing decision is defined as a point in the space of alternatives at which the membership function of a fuzzy decision attains its maximum value. The use of these concepts is illustrated by examples involving multistage decision processes in which the system under control is either deterministic or stochastic. By using dynamic programming, the determination of a maximizing decision is reduced to the solution of a system of functional equations. A reverse-flow technique is described for the solution of a functional equation arising in connection with a decision process in which the termination time is defined implicitly by the condition that the process stops when the system under control enters a specified set of states in its state space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—I
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 · Cited by 12,187
Self-citationThe Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—II
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90046-8 · Cited by 2,555
Self-citationIs There a Need for Fuzzy Logic?
Zadeh, L. A. (2008) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.02.012 · Cited by 1,352
Self-citationA decision theoretic framework for approximating concepts
Yao, Y. Y., & Wong, S. K. M. (1992) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/0020-7373(92)90069-w · Cited by 608
Kaya, İ., Çolak, M., & Terzi, F. (2019) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.03.003 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1970-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- B-141-B-164
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W4292158025
- Cited by
- 6,813
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.b141
- The paper
- Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.b141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.