Cited by 2,555Multi-Criteria Decision MakingFuzzy and Soft Set TheoryRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic

The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—II

Zadeh, L.A.·1975·Information Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90046-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fuzzy set theory has been recognized as an effective framework for addressing the uncertainty and imprecision inherent in linguistic assessments, thereby providing substantial support for decision-making processes.

    “For more than half a century, fuzzy set theory has been recognized as an effective framework for addressing the uncertainty and imprecision inherent in linguistic assessments, thereby providing substantial support for decision-making processes [47].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zadeh, L. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Zadeh, L.A.
Venue
Information Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
301-357
ISSN
0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4240278385
Cited by
2,555
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 69
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Keywords
ELECTRE II, multi-criteria group decision-making, outranking relations, fuzzy ELECTRE, linguistic variables, approximate reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review