The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Consumers Strategic? Structural Estimation from the Air-Travel Industry
Open accessAbstract
Consumers often consider delaying a purchase strategically, anticipating that prices might decrease. Combining two unique data sources from the air-travel industry (posted fare data and booking data), we use a structural model to estimate the fraction of strategic consumers in the population, assuming different levels of sophistication in consumers' perception of future prices: perfect foresight and weak- and strong-form rational expectations. We find that 5.2% to 19.2% of the population is strategic across markets, measured by the first and third quartiles. Our intermarket analysis indicates that shorter trips with more attractive outside options are populated with more strategic consumers. Using a nonparametric approach, we further find that most strategic consumers arrive either at the beginning of the booking horizon or close to departure. Finally, our counterfactual analysis shows that, contrary to conventional wisdom, the presence of strategic consumers does not necessarily hurt revenues. Rather, the impact varies by market. Commitment to a nondecreasing pricing strategy is more likely to benefit business markets than leisure markets, or it could even hurt leisure markets. Intermarket analysis shows that city pairs with lower Internet penetration, higher average price, and shorter distances tend to benefit more from such commitment as well. This paper was accepted by Yossi Aviv, operations management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811241 · Cited by 8,092
The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management
Talluri, K. T., & Van Ryzin, G. J. (2004) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/b139000 · Cited by 2,243
Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Inventories with Stochastic Demand over Finite Horizons
Gallego, G., & van Ryzin, G. (1994) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.8.999 · Cited by 1,557
Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (1996) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.15.1.1 · Cited by 1,221
Advanced Methods of Marketing Research
Bagozzi, R. P. (1994) · Cited by 1,159
Sequential Estimation of Dynamic Discrete Games
Aguirregabiria, V., & Mira, P. (2007) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00731.x · Cited by 704
Optimal Pricing of Seasonal Products in the Presence of Forward-Looking Consumers
Aviv, Y., & Pazgal, A. (2008) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.1070.0183 · Cited by 686
Chapman, P. G., Griliches, Z., Intrilligator, M. D., & Arrow, K. J. (1987) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2982051 · Cited by 680
Competition and Price Dispersion in the U.S. Airline Industry
Borenstein, S., & Rose, N. L. (1994) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261950 · Cited by 668
Measuring the Implications of Sales and Consumer Inventory Behavior
Hendel, I., & Nevo, A. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00721.x · Cited by 620
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Granados, N., & Netessine, S.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2114-2137
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3123260353
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 14.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Consumers Strategic? Structural Estimation from the Air-Travel Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1860
- The paper
- Li, J., Granados, N., & Netessine, S. (2014). Are Consumers Strategic? Structural Estimation from the Air-Travel Industry. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.