The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human and Financial Capital for Microenterprise Development: Evidence from a Field and Lab Experiment
Open accessAbstract
Microenterprises constitute an important source of employment, and developing such enterprises is a key policy concern in most countries. But what is the most efficient tool for microenterprise development? We study this question in a developing country context (Tanzania), where microenterprises are the source of employment for more than half of the labor force, and we report from a field experiment that jointly investigated the importance of a human capital intervention (business training) and a financial capital intervention (business grant). Using data from three survey rounds, a lab experiment, and administrative records of the microfinance institution, we present evidence on business performance, management practices, happiness, business knowledge, and noncognitive abilities. Our study demonstrates strong effects of the combination of the two interventions on male entrepreneurs, while the effects on female entrepreneurs are much more muted. The results suggest that long-term finance is an important constraint for microfinance entrepreneurs, but that business training is essential to transform financial capital into productive investments. Our study also points to the need for more comprehensive measures to promote the businesses of female entrepreneurs. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1933 . This paper was accepted by John List, behavioral economics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/504455 · Cited by 4,427
Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067 · Cited by 3,186
Can Entrepreneurial Activity be Taught? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Central America
Klinger, B., & Schündeln, M. (2011) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.021 · Cited by 171
Cited by
McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2014) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/lkt007 · Cited by 659
Teaching personal initiative beats traditional training in boosting small business in West Africa
Campos, F., Frese, M., Goldstein, M., Iacovone, L., Johnson, H. C., McKenzie, D., & Mensmann, M. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan5329 · Cited by 399
Entrepreneurship programs in developing countries: A meta regression analysis
Cho, Y., & Honorati, M. (2014) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2014.03.011 · Cited by 223
McKenzie, D. (2021) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grab002 · Cited by 148
Returns to microcredit, cash grants and training for male and female microentrepreneurs in Uganda
Fiala, N. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.027 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Berge, L. I. O., Bjorvatn, K., & Tungodden, B.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 707-722
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W2152560452
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 63.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.