Cited by 3,186Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?

Niederle, M., Vesterlund, L.·2007·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

We examine whether men and women of the same ability differ in their selection into a competitive environment. Participants in a laboratory experiment solve a real task, first under a noncompetitive piece rate and then a competitive tournament incentive scheme. Although there are no gender differences in performance, men select the tournament twice as much as women when choosing their compensation scheme for the next performance. While 73 percent of the men select the tournament, only 35 percent of the women make this choice. This gender gap in tournament entry is not explained by performance, and factors such as risk and feedback aversion only playa negligible role. Instead, the tournament-entry gap is driven by men being more overconfident and by gender differences in preferences for performing in a competition. The result is that women shy away from competition and men embrace it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Altonji, Joseph G., and Rebecca Blank "Race and Gender in the Labor Market" in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics Volume 3c Elsevier Science B.V. (1999): 3144-3259.
  2. Beyer, Sylvia, 'Gender Differences in the Accuracy of Self-Evaluations of Performance,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , LIX (1990), 960 - 970.
  3. Beyer, Sylvia, and Edward M. Bowden, 'Gender Differences in Self-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence From Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias,' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , XXIII (1997), 157 - 172.
  4. Ginther, Donna 'Women in Economics: Moving Up or Falling Off the Academic Career Ladder?' Journal of Economic Perspectives (Summer 2004) 18:3, 193-214.
  5. Gneezy, Uri, Muriel Niederle, and Aldo Rustichini, 'Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences,' Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 2003, p. 1049-1074.
  6. Hyde, Janet Shibley, Elizabeth Fennema, and Susan J. Lamon, 'Gender Differences in Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis,' Psychological Bulletin (1990), 107:2, 139-155.
  7. Jones, E. E. and Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24
  8. Larson, Lia Christine, 2005, 'When Girls Stop Competing Against Boys: An Experimental Analysis of the Competitive Behavior of Young Children', Harvard Honors Thesis.
  9. Polachek, Solomon W., 'Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in Occupational Structure', Review of Economics and Statistics , LXIII (1981), 60-69.
  10. Rosen, S. (1986) 'The theory of equalizing differences', in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard, eds., Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, North-Holland.
  11. Ross, L. (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Volume 10, pp. 173-240), Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
1067-1101
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2890421732
Cited by
3,186
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 204 · 2024: 251 · 2023: 235 · 2022: 254 · 2021: 221 · 2020: 226 · 2019: 209 · 2018: 221 · 2017: 173 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 171 · 2014: 154 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 102
FWCI
197.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
gender differences, competition, tournament entry, tournament incentives, piece rates, overconfidence, risk aversion, compensation systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review