Hidden Skewness: On the Difficulty of Multiplicative Compounding Under Random Shocks
Abstract
Multiplicative growth processes that are subject to random shocks often have an asymmetric distribution of outcomes. In a series of incentivized laboratory experiments, we show that a large majority of participants either strongly underestimate the asymmetry or ignore it completely. Participants misperceive the spread of the outcome distribution to be too narrowband, and they estimate the median and the mode to lie too close to the center of the distribution, failing to account for the compound nature of average growth. The observed biases are measured irrespective to risk preferences and they appear under a variety of conditions. The biases are largely consistent with a behavioral model in which geometric growth is confused with linear growth. This confusion is a possible driver of investors’ difficulties with real-world financial products like leveraged exchange-traded funds and retirement savings plans. Data and the online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2618 . This paper was accepted by Teck-Hua Ho, behavioral economics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555217 · Cited by 1,288 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Apesteguia, J., Oechssler, J., & Weidenholzer, S. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3508 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ensthaler, L., Nottmeyer, O., Weizsäcker, G., & Zankiewicz, C.
- Affiliations
- WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE)
- IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
- German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- ORCID
- Weizsäcker, Georg
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1693-1706
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W3022193740
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University College London
- Technische Universität Berlin
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- random shocks, skewness, geometric growth, compound growth, investor decision-making, leveraged ETFs, retirement savings, behavioral finance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review