Cited by 76Digital Marketing and Social MediaDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsDigital Platforms and Economics

The impact of social nudges on user-generated content for social network platforms

Open access
Zeng, Zhiyu, Dai, Hengchen, Zhang, Dennis J., Zhang, Heng, Zhang, Renyu, Xu, Zhiwei, Shen, Zuo-Jun Max·2023·Management Science

Abstract

Content-sharing social network platforms rely heavily on user-generated content to attract users and advertisers, but they have limited authority over content provision. We develop an intervention that leverages social interactions between users to stimulate content production. We study social nudges, whereby users connected with a content provider on a platform encourage that provider to supply more content. We conducted a randomized field experiment (N [Formula: see text]) on a video-sharing social network platform where treatment providers could receive messages from other users encouraging them to produce more, but control providers could not. We find that social nudges not only immediately boosted video supply by 13.21% without changing video quality but also, increased the number of nudges providers sent to others by 15.57%. Such production-boosting and diffusion effects, although declining over time, lasted beyond the day of receiving nudges and were amplified when nudge senders and recipients had stronger ties. We replicate these results in a second experiment. To estimate the overall production boost over the entire network and guide platforms to utilize social nudges, we combine the experimental data with a social network model that captures the diffusion and over-time effects of social nudges. We showcase the importance of considering the network effects when estimating the impact of social nudges and optimizing platform operations regarding social nudges. Our research highlights the value of leveraging co-user influence for platforms and provides guidance for future research to incorporate the diffusion of an intervention into the estimation of its impacts within a social network. This paper was accepted by Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, operations management. Funding: H. Dai thanks the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) [Hellman Fellowship and Faculty Development Award] for funding support. R. Zhang is grateful for financial support from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council [Grant 16505418]. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4622 .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4622

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zeng, Z., Dai, H., Zhang, D. J., Zhang, H., Zhang, R., Xu, Z., & Shen, Z.-J. M.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Independent Contributor, Beijing 100000, China;
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Management Science
Published
2023-09
Volume
69
Issue
9
Pages
5189-5208
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
OpenAlex
W4312001262
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Management Science (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
social nudges, user-generated content, content creation, online video platforms, social network models, network effects, platform operation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review