The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Climate Risk and Capital Structure
Open accessAbstract
We use firm-level data that measure forward-looking physical climate risk to examine the impact of climate risk on capital structure. We find that greater physical climate risk leads to lower leverage in the post-2015 period (i.e., after the Paris Agreement and the first step of standardization of disclosure of climate risk information). Our results hold after controlling for firm characteristics known to determine leverage, including credit ratings. Our evidence shows that the reduction in leverage related to climate risk is shared between a demand effect (the firm’s optimal leverage decreases) and a supply effect (bankers and bondholders increase spreads when lending to firms with the greatest risk). Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that physical climate risk affects leverage via larger expected distress costs and higher operating costs. This paper was accepted by Colin Mayer, Special Section of Management Science on Business and Climate Change. Funding: This project benefited from the financial support of the Institut Europlace de Finance (Grant EIF 2019). Q. Moreau acknowledges financial support from the French Association of Institutional Investors. The authors have received in-kind support from Carbone 4 for this project in the form of a data set of climate risk ratings. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4952 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(84)90023-0 · Cited by 18,957
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2971733 · Cited by 5,486
The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz137 · Cited by 3,034
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2021) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa071 · Cited by 1,136
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3204420 · Cited by 1,136
Climate risks and market efficiency
Hong, H., Li, F. W., & Xu, J. (2019) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.09.015 · Cited by 967
An inconvenient cost: The effects of climate change on municipal bonds
Painter, M. (2020) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.006 · Cited by 776
Pricing Uncertainty Induced by Climate Change
Barnett, M., Brock, W., & Hansen, L. P. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz144 · Cited by 467
Andersson, M., Bolton, P., & Samama, F. (2016) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v72.n3.4 · Cited by 434
Cited by
Corporate Climate Risk: Measurements and Responses
Li, Q., Shan, H., Tang, Y., & Yao, V. (2024) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhad094 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Ginglinger, E., & Moreau, Q.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7492-7516
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W4387818547
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 122.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climate Risk and Capital Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4952
- The paper
- Ginglinger, E., & Moreau, Q. (2023). Climate Risk and Capital Structure. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.