The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems
Abstract
The paper presents a comprehensive framework for research in Management Information Systems (MIS). The necessity for a more comprehensive research framework is derived from a review of past research frameworks. The new framework is validated by mapping 331 MIS doctoral dissertations into its research categories. The dissertations are also classified by research methodology employed. The comprehensive MIS research model is useful not only in understanding and classifying MIS research but also in generating potential hypotheses for future research. Hypothesis generation using the model is explained and illustrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Survey research methodology in management information systems: an assessment
Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. (1993) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1993.11518001 · Cited by 1,288
An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems
Weill, P., & Olson, M. H. (1989) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1989.11517849 · Cited by 351
Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1998) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00028-7 · Cited by 334
Collaboration Through Open Superposition: A Theory of the Open Source Way1
Howison, J., & Crowston, K. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.02 · Cited by 175
Some Guidelines for the Critical Reviewing of Conceptual Papers
Louisiana State University, U., & Hirschheim, R. (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00167 · Cited by 163
Exemplary Works on Information Systems Research
Whitman, M. E., & Woszczynski, A. B. (2011) · The Handbook of Information Systems Research · doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-144-5.ch001 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ives, B., Hamilton, S., & Davis, G. B.
- Venue
- Management Science
- Published
- 1980-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 910-934
- ISSN
- 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5501
- OpenAlex
- W1965602425
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
